I'd like to ask you something. Pretend for a minute that these conspiracy theorists are correct, and that you are one of them. How would you go about getting proof?
...
But they have, in that laser tools have been/are used both looking upward from the ground, and looking downward from satellite. Not that I suppose the scientists were looking for materials they didn't expect to find.I wonder why no-one has considered spectroscopy. Surely if we can analyse the light from stars millions of light years away then we can point a spectroscope at a persistent contrail and end this once and for all.
I wonder why no-one has considered spectroscopy. Surely if we can analyse the light from stars millions of light years away then we can point a spectroscope at a persistent contrail and end this once and for all.
We get a visible light crystallography often enough when cirrostratus clearly originated from contrails displays impressive halos arcs and sundogs exactly the same as those displayed in completely naturally formed cirrostratus. The two cloudscapes can only be composed of the same substance with the same crystal geometry; water ice. A different substance would have a different display.
This is a fairly stringent test. Very hard to fake.
I am amused by the idea of sending up an aircraft to take in situ samples. Wouldn't that very aircraft produce "chemtrails" as it closed on its target? That would be a bit embarrassing.
There is no need to actually take a sample. Use a "trusted" aircraft. Any aircraft will do. Identify one that is "chemtrailing", and have it inspected when it lands. If there is no spray equipment, it then becomes the "trusted" aircraft, post facto. Conclude that chemtrails don't exist after all. If it does have spray equipment, then we have some work to do.
It's difficult to find a fault with either if these simple tests. Yet they are done every day, in a sense. It's hard to understand why this (chemtrails) has had legs for 15 years.
We get a visible light crystallography often enough when cirrostratus clearly originated from contrails displays impressive halos arcs and sundogs exactly the same as those displayed in completely naturally formed cirrostratus. The two cloudscapes can only be composed of the same substance with the same crystal geometry; water ice. A different substance would have a different display.
That's great, I didn't know or think of this simple use of logic.
Are there tests and proofs for this? ie, how alduteration of water ice with other substances would effect the ability of light to prism?
I'm also curious of this,
on one day i suspected chemtrails (criss-crossing spreading contrails, with clouds seemingly developing from them), i also saw a very amazing light show, rainbows all over, upside down, wiggly ones, it was bizarre and though all very black swan, i have only seen this twice, on days where contrails were spreading to form clouds, the second time was far less spectacular, but still what i presume they call sun dogs.
That's great, I didn't know or think of this simple use of logic.
Are there tests and proofs for this? ie, how alduteration of water ice with other substances would effect the ability of light to prism?
An argument I used with the Bard of Ely. Friday night off for me. Thanks Mick. Right on. There should be more sites with Atoptics's quality. Does this site have a list of quality sites?The shape of the halos (and their angular positions relative to the sun) proves that it is comprised of crystals with the same heaxgonal structure and refractive index of water ice. That immediately rules out powders like iron oxide or titanium oxide. It also rules out frozen liquids with a different refractive index, or other suggestions like oil.
An argument I used with the Bard of Ely. Friday night off for me. Thanks Mick. Right on. There should be more sites with Atoptics's quality. Does this site have a list of quality sites?