He's been called out now, so what's the difference?
To me, logically, the difference is very profound.
Can I ask do you believe in the truth of these statements:
1) In the past the establishment has suppressed information.
2) It is rational to expect that the establishment continues to suppress information.
If you don't, then we just have no common ground. For me the "Suppression hypothesis" is a key instrument in understanding any controversial theory.
It seems a completely rational and skeptical hypothesis.