Explained: Apollo 17 Photo of Earth from Moon Seems too High

drhex

New Member
This photo http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/as17-134-20387.jpg which shows an astronaut on the moon with the Earth visible in the sky, has come up in a facebook discussion:
as17-134-20387.jpg



The claim is that Earth appears too low in the sky for image to be real.
What I've found out so far: The link is to a Nasa website and so should not be altered by anyone else.
Googling the filename show that is is from Apollo 17 and thus Taurus-Littrow.
Using astronomy software "stellarium", I found that Earth should be 44-60 degrees above the horizon from Taurus-Littrow, and to be more precise at 45 degrees on december 11-12 1972 during Apollo 17.

I'm no expert on image analysis but Earth should use up about 2 degrees of the field of vision when seen from the moon. Counting how many Earths fit between its position in the image and the horizon, it appears to be about 25 degrees up here, which is indeed too low.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Using astronomy software "stellarium", I found that Earth should be 44-60 degrees above the horizon from Taurus-Littrow, and to be more precise at 45 degrees on december 11-12 1972 during Apollo 17.
Can you show your working?
 

Nada Truther

Active Member
The middle pic in the top row is clearly taken from a low angle. Probably to get the earth in the shot. Because, it probably was at a 45 degree angle from the horizon and wouldn't be in the shot. Some good photography skills recognizing how good the shot of old glory would look with Terra Firma in the background. The actually shot is less obvious to tell if it is taken from a low angle, but the horizon is hardly a horizon. Unless it is a fish-eye lens, it would most likely be a hill or some other steep land formation, as previously stated. This just goes to show how one person can view something and be sure of one outcome, and another can look at it from a completely view-point angle and get a completely different result. The proof is in the research. One image would yield less variation, but multiple images will show much more information to arrive at the conclusion that it is a hill, not the horizon.
 

Hama Neggs

Senior Member.
It should be obvious that the very curved surface of land is not a normal Lunar horizon. Amazing how people can overlook the obvious when declaring that they have obvious proof of something.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
The hill is the South Massif. Based on this topographic map, the South Massif summit is at 7141 metres, while the landing site is at about 4680 metres, giving a height difference of about 2460 metres.

upload_2016-9-20_18-42-43.png

Measuring on Photoshop using the ruler tool gives a distance of almost exactly 12 kilometres from the landing site to the summit. Ignoring the moon's curvature, that would give an altitude above the horizon of arctan (2460/12000) = 11.6 degrees.

It's hard to measure the exact height from the photo in the OP as the top of the hill is obscured.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
This photo gives a better idea.




Rotated:

upload_2016-9-20_19-5-36.png

Measuring that in Photoshop I get an angle of about 15 Earth diameters, or 29 degrees based on an Earth angular diameter of 1.9 degrees, from the centre of the Earth to the top of the hill. If we then add the 11.6 degree height of the hill we get to 40.6 degrees, which is not all that far from what it should be, given the uncertainties in measurement.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
I haven't checked the actual elevation of the Earth during Apollo 17, but I found this discussion on the Collectspace forums, where posters generally know their stuff:

http://www.collectspace.com/ubb/Forum29/HTML/000839.html
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
On Google Earth (Moon) the top of that hill is about 11° above level from the lander site.. But I'm not sure how accurate GE is for that type of thing. KMZ attached
20160920-113956-d13rf.jpg
 

Attachments

I've done an extensive study of All Apollo's Earth images, and I've looked at that one on this my site - this image is from there and shows the visible and infra red images of Earth on the day the Apollo image was taken:




I've also looked at some images from Apollo where Earth is visible in reflected in astronaut visors, including Apollo 17.

Here's one of the visor shots:



and here's what Stellarium says should be visible:



Earth is exactly where it should be in the Apollo images.

I'd recommend getting Stellarium, setting the location for APollo 17 and the time for during the mission and you'll see where Earth should be and what it should look like :)

Anyone who doubts how big the Earth is in Apollo images from the moon needs only to go outside and take a picture of the moon, then compare what they see on their photo with what they can see in the sky.
 
Last edited:

drhex

New Member
It should be obvious that the very curved surface of land is not a normal Lunar horizon. Amazing how people can overlook the obvious when declaring that they have obvious proof of something.
I also thought the surface looked too curved, but assumed that was due to wide angle lens distortion. With more context, that South Massif is a better explanation. Thanks everyone.
 

Redwood

Active Member
Another minor point is that although the Earth, as viewed from the Moon, stays "pretty much" in the same position in the sky, it does vary.

The moon's orbit is tilted 5 deg. to the ecliptic, and its axis is tilted another 1.5 deg. From the Moon's poles, the Earth will actually appear to slowly rise and set, with the maximum setting occurring (for the north pole) when the moon is at its northernmost point in its orbit relative to Earth, and the Moon's north pole is tilted at maximum away from the Earth. Vice-versa for the South Pole. At Moon latitudes in between, the effect is less but is still measurable.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
You lost me. What axis is tilted to the Moon's poles? Earth's?
The axis of the moon's rotation is tilted 1.5 degrees from the plane of the moon's orbit. (For comparison, the Earth's axis has a tilt of 23.5 degrees relative to the Earth's orbit.)

This picture shows the tilts relative to their own orbital planes, not relative to each other.

 

Hama Neggs

Senior Member.
The axis of the moon's rotation is tilted 1.5 degrees from the plane of the moon's orbit. (For comparison, the Earth's axis has a tilt of 23.5 degrees relative to the Earth's orbit.)

This picture shows the tilts relative to their own orbital planes, not relative to each other.

Oh... right. I read the other post wrong.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
A Explained: astronaut's movement causes lunar flag to wave in Apollo 15 footage Conspiracy Theories 0
Mick West Explained: New Navy UFO Videos UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 69
Cassi O Polaris Height Perspective Explained (No math required) Flat Earth 1
Mick West Explained: RARE Video Footage of "Alien Space Craft" WATCHING ISS Astronaut! UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Mick West Explained: The "Many Faces" of Patrick Crusius, the El Paso Shooter Conspiracy Theories 22
Mick West Explained: "Beam of Light" in To The Stars Academy header images UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Mick West Explained: "UFOS" in Donald Trump's Crowd Photo on 4th of July UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 3
D Explained: Photo of 747 with Contrails Only on One Side [Fake, April Fool] Contrails and Chemtrails 21
Qulaey Explained: 17.61 Mile Mirror Flash Supposedly Proves Flat Earth [Refraction] Flat Earth 5
Mick West Explained: The Navy's New "UFO" Reporting Guidelines UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 32
Mick West Explained: "It's photoshopped because it has to be" Flat Earth 3
Mick West Explained: Jet Chasing UFO: X-45A and F/A-18B Formation Flight Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 6
Trailblazer Explained: video of concentric circular "chemtrails" (E-3 Sentry AWACS plane, Feb 1 2019) Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 3
Rory Explained: How Mount Rainier helps demonstrate the shape of the globe Flat Earth 38
creatonez Explained: Why the Earth does not look oblate in photos from space Flat Earth 0
MikeG Explained: EU Army Deployed to Paris Conspiracy Theories 1
Mick West Explained: Unexplained Green Light During Thunderstorm Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 7
Mick West Explained: Flashes of Light During the World Trade Center Collapse 9/11 5
Mick West Explained: House "Cut in Half", Tubbs Fire, Santa Rosa, Coffey Park Wildfires 0
Mick West Explained: Burnt Cars on California Beach [TV Set] Wildfires 1
Mick West Explained: Unknown Brewing Company UFO UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Mick West Explained: Why Kavanaugh's Calendar PDF looks Edited [OCR] Current Events 0
Mick West Explained: Mysterious Red Planet Like Object Filmed Next To The Moon. Atglen [Reflection] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Mick West Explained: Podesta 14 + Fish [Promotional Tweet for UN Global Sustainability Goals] Conspiracy Theories 7
Mick West Explained: Dark Streak UFO Photo - Barn Swallow + Motion Blur UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Mick West Explained: DEW Energy Beam Starting Forest Fires - Dirty Lens, Light Streak Conspiracy Theories 13
Mick West Explained: A Dozen Or More Southern Valley UFOs UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Mick West Explained: Floating Triangle UFO in Buenos Aires Google Maps [Bridge] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Rory Explained: Space Shuttle Footage Reflection of Face [Shot Through Window] Conspiracy Theories 5
Mick West Explained: Washington State Island "Mystery missile" - Helicopter Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 49
Andrew Gillett Explained: Squares in the sky? [Reflection of lights in a window] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 18
Mick West Explained: Mysterious lights over Milwaukee [Seagulls, Night Exposure Trails] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 27
Mick West Explained: Why Some Marjory Stoneman Douglas Shooting Google Search Results Predate the Event Conspiracy Theories 1
Priyadi Explained: Why We Don't See Satellites in Photos Taken From The ISS Flat Earth 1
Trailblazer Explained: Vatican "chemtrail spraying" coin [part of set depicting Pope's travels] Contrails and Chemtrails 4
deirdre Explained: Mysterious burning crater in Mexico spurs UFO crash speculation (Garbage pit) UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Benjamin Moore Explained: Why Earth Has A Magnetic Core Even Though the core is Molten Metal Flat Earth 2
FlightMuj Explained: Photo from ISS shows "open window" [Scratch Cover] Flat Earth 2
Mick West Explained: "Smoke Trails" On 9/11 World Trade Center Falling Debris [Dust/Powder] 9/11 10
Mick West Explained: Roy Moore Two Color Yearbook Signature [Depth of Field Chromatic Aberration] Conspiracy Theories 34
Mick West Explained: Why Planes Get Dented Nosecones - It's Mostly Birds General Discussion 4
Mick West Explained: Unburned trees next to burned down structures as evidence of secret "energy weapons" Wildfires 119
Mick West Explained: Photo of "UFO" Used in Connection with Nimitz Incident [Balloon] UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 8
Mick West Explained: Mexico City Earthquake Lights [Power Line Arcing and Transformer Explosions] Science and Pseudoscience 30
Mick West Explained: Cloud Seeding Weather Modification in Texas before Hurricane Harvey Contrails and Chemtrails 1
Bunkmeister Explained: Coast Guard Geographic Range Table promoted by flat earthers Flat Earth 15
Mick West Explained: Charlottesville Car Attack License Plates - Ohio GVF 1111 (and GVF 1122) Conspiracy Theories 2
FlightMuj Explained: NASA documents stating a flat Earth??? Linear Aircraft Models Flat Earth 7
FlightMuj Explained: 443 km distance- mountains visible. Flat Earth 13
Mick West Explained: Manurewa NZ, 'Extra-terrestrial' Fireball Jumps Up [Contrail, Altitude change] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 7
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top