Jay Reynolds
Senior Member.
Some background I want to present. This was one of Wigington's first works on the subject:
Diminished solar charge capacities due to persistent contrails
August 2007
Link
Wigington's response was:
For the record, I believe that Wigington did do a full spectrum lab test of that dust he scraped off his solar panels for many other elements besides aluminum, barium and strontium.
He is hiding that lab report because it shows those elements to be of a typical spectrum of crustal elements, and was not a "cherry-picked" test just for the three elements commonly yet falsely claimed to be a "chemtrail signature".
If Wigington ever displays such a full elemental analysis, everything he claims will fall to pieces, and he knows it.
Diminished solar charge capacities due to persistent contrails
August 2007
Link
As some may know, nearly a year ago I asked for Wigington to publish the lab test he claimed to have in the above paper.Dane Wigington said:The spraying continued in the other seasons, especially spring and fall. Its appearance was less thick but more complete in its coverage of the skies above. My loss of solar uptake was in the 20 to 30% range. Still more than enough to hamper severely my potential to pump adequate water from my well for dryer season needs. I also began to take notice of surprising accumulations of dust on my panels. This also diminishes charging potential. Knowing the ingredients mentioned in the patents, I decided to take a few dust samples to a lab in our area that performs all of the state’s testing in the region. This was to be the beginning of a chain of alarming data and tests. The dust was full of aluminum and barium. I live on the top of the highest forested mountaintop in the immediate area. There are no mines or potential areas of contamination within many miles of my location. There was only one plausible origin for this dust that I could come up with. Acting on this conclusion, I tested the final snow storm of the 07' season, as well as the final four rainstorms, for aluminum and barium content in the water. All tests showed significant quantities of these metals. I checked with a hydro-geologist I know about this and he assured me that unless I lived next to an Alcoa factory, there is no way I should have these metals in my rain in any quantity. I tested my rubber-lined pond for an accumulation for the two years it has been installed. The reading was off the scale at 375000 ug/l. The testing has continued, now about two dozen by many different residents throughout the county, and the results continue to worsen.
Jay Reynolds said:I was happy to hear from Ed Griffin as Chairman of the Coalition Against Geoengineering that he was in favor of openness and sharing of data on which his organization bases their claims. I would like to do a complete review of all data collected by the Coalition Against Geoengineering members.
The more complete the data that I have to work with, the more accurate my review will be. CAG has made links to some of the tests online, but according to some statements made by your membership and your website, there appear to be many tests that are missing in your database here:
http://geoengineeringwatch.org/library/testing/
While there could be more tests available, at a minimum I need the following, which you have publicly cited, to complete my review:
1. All 45 lab tests cited by Mauro Oliviera on 5/27/2009 before the California Energy Commission.
2. All pond and spring lab tests taken at the property of Lynn Dorrah showing 375,000 ugl aluminum, also cited by Mauro Oliviera on 5/27/2009 before the California Energy Commission.
3. Dust lab tests from solar panels mentioned by Dane Wigington in his article, “Diminished Solar Charge Capacities Due to Persistent Contrails”
4. Soil lab tests taken by Francis Mangels showing 1% aluminum cited in his
“Statement on Aerosols and Drought for DOE 5/27/09 in Sacramento”
I suggest that it would be very helpful if these could be made available to anyone within the current geoengineeringwatch.com library, along with the ones currently displayed. I will appreciate your cooperation in getting these tests available online soon.
Sincerely,
John B. (Jay) Reynolds
Wigington's response was:
All testing done by me is, and has always been, available on line.
For the record, I believe that Wigington did do a full spectrum lab test of that dust he scraped off his solar panels for many other elements besides aluminum, barium and strontium.
He is hiding that lab report because it shows those elements to be of a typical spectrum of crustal elements, and was not a "cherry-picked" test just for the three elements commonly yet falsely claimed to be a "chemtrail signature".
If Wigington ever displays such a full elemental analysis, everything he claims will fall to pieces, and he knows it.