News in the CPH case.
The witness who first raised the alarm has given an interview to a newspaper. She has been questioned several times by the police, who brought in "experts" to analyze her video, and the conclusion is that it's a plane, and the small dot moving around is lens glare.
The police have also interviewed several of her colleagues, and the message to them was the same as to her, there are no drones in the footage.
But she is sticking to her story and does not believe the police.
The article is behind a paywall, so I can't share it.
Meanwhile, on the political side, a final report was supposed to be released a couple of weeks ago, but on the same day an election was called. The politicians have postponed it until after the election and refuse to comment on what the conclusion is.
The witness who first raised the alarm has given an interview to a newspaper. She has been questioned several times by the police, who brought in "experts" to analyze her video, and the conclusion is that it's a plane, and the small dot moving around is lens glare.
The police have also interviewed several of her colleagues, and the message to them was the same as to her, there are no drones in the footage.
But she is sticking to her story and does not believe the police.
The article is behind a paywall, so I can't share it.
Meanwhile, on the political side, a final report was supposed to be released a couple of weeks ago, but on the same day an election was called. The politicians have postponed it until after the election and refuse to comment on what the conclusion is.
