Which pictures? The issue of the "what about all this evidence" argument, be it pictures or reports or experiences, is that each photo or report is an individual incident. As noted earlier, in formal debate the idea of just recounting one argument after another to keep one's opponent constantly trying to offer individual rebuttals is known as a "Gish Gallop":
External Quote:
The Gish gallop is a term for an eristic technique in which a debater attempts to overwhelm an opponent by excessive number of arguments, without regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments. The term was coined by Eugenie Scott and named after the creationist Duane Gish, who used the technique frequently against proponents of evolution.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop
Note that the idea is to overload with "excessive number of arguments, without regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments".
There does not seem to be a similar fallacy for the same idea outside of formal debate, but we've kicked around a few names. I'm partial to "The sum of the parts fallacy". Or maybe the "where there's smoke there's fire fallacy". It's the idea that, if there is a lot of bits of evidence for something, then it must be true. But the problem is, if more and more of the many bits of evidence turn out to be wrong, then the conclusion is suspect. That is to say, there was no fire, just some smoldering ashes.
So, what people here strive to do is look at EACH piece of evidence, rather than get overwhelmed by the volume. It's tedious and time consuming, but the work gets split up across many people with different interests.
Taken as a whole, it may seem like the overwhelming amount of photos of UFO/UAPs indicates they are real, as in alien/supernatural. But as each photo is taken as a single piece of evidence and systematically looked at, that may not be the case.
If one were to present 10 photos of UFO/UAPs and say "Look at all these, it's conclusive" the response here would be to look at each individual photo. IF it turns out, 2 where bohka or some other type of camera glitch/reflection, 1 was an identifiable aircraft, 2 were stars or planets, 1 was an obvious hoax, that leaves 4 that may just fall into the Low Information Zone (LIZ). They're just to fuzzy or there isn't enough information to get an idea about what we're seeing. We've gone from 10 "for sures" to 4 "maybes". Not nearly as conclusive.
If you have specific photos in mind, maybe share them and we can see if they have been discussed here before or if not, maybe they would constitute their own thread.