txt29
Senior Member.
In the thread https://www.metabunk.org/apollo-17-photos-and-transcript-contradicting-explanation-required.t9186/ user NobleOne made the following statement about the video discussed there:
This is the concerned video:
And this is likely the frame he refers to:
NobleOne probably refers to the shadows pointing in different angles towards the same point further away. I guess he never heard about the term called the perspective. It is true that given the distance of the light source (the Sun), the shadows should appear almost parallel. What NobleOne omitted is that this would be true only for the view from a distance directly above the scene. In photos from another angle (or in realistic painting and artwork), parallels appear as lines joining at a distant point, hence the shadows in this photo are perfectly conform with being parallel. In conclusion the shadows in the photo cannot be considered as an evidence for the use of multiple light sources (i.e. reflectors in a studio) or for other image/video manipulation:
Very nice set of proofs debunking moon walks. Also, shadows from buggy, stones, pole in the middle to astronaut get interesting from 04:42 to 04:54. They are not consistent in their directions. It's all to obvious the moon landing as is presented to us is governments perpetuated lie.
This is the concerned video:
And this is likely the frame he refers to:
NobleOne probably refers to the shadows pointing in different angles towards the same point further away. I guess he never heard about the term called the perspective. It is true that given the distance of the light source (the Sun), the shadows should appear almost parallel. What NobleOne omitted is that this would be true only for the view from a distance directly above the scene. In photos from another angle (or in realistic painting and artwork), parallels appear as lines joining at a distant point, hence the shadows in this photo are perfectly conform with being parallel. In conclusion the shadows in the photo cannot be considered as an evidence for the use of multiple light sources (i.e. reflectors in a studio) or for other image/video manipulation:
Last edited: