At least they answer my questions!
Let me give it a try, its not all your questions, but most relevant I think...
NoDo you have to be a chemmie or a debunker?
Which conflicting information? I think there is always hope...What hope is there for those of us who retain an open mind, due to conflicting information?
Depending on what you call the truth; yes of course, however it sometimes even seems hard to agree on what is 'truth'Shouldn't we be working together to establish truth?
Probably not, unless there was a lot of bunk in their story.Had anyone highlighted that before the MOD disclosed it, would they also have been 'debunked' by this forum?
I think that is for Mick to answer, but I don't think soWill I be dismissed?
No antrhax was sprayed, see also the answer from Dadid Fraser ( https://www.metabunk.org/threads/a-challenge-to-you-to-discuss-this-openly.2328/#post-64753 )But I have to ask, did you consent to being sparayed with Anthrax?
Its in the article you linked yourself:Anthrax and zinc cadmium sulphide for example? Can you tell me who thought these to be harmless?
And I don't think they thought anthrax was harmless, were do you get that idea from?The tests, carried out by government scientists at Porton Down, were designed to help the MoD assess Britain's vulnerability if the Russians were to have released clouds of deadly germs over the country.
In most cases, the trials did not use biological weapons but alternatives which scientists believed would mimic germ warfare and which the MoD claimed were harmless.
Last edited by a moderator: