FatEarther
Member
He emailed me to say he thought it was bigger than that.
Ask him if he ever watches the cricket when the camera is behind the umpire. Does he think the bowler and batsman are 1 metre apart?
He emailed me to say he thought it was bigger than that.
I'm not understanding your comparison here. Many experienced pilots have trouble deciphering the size of objects against the sky. Even Dreyfuss, in Jaws, made Brody walk to the end of the plank for 'scale' in his shot with an ocean background.Ask him if he ever watches the cricket when the camera is behind the umpire. Does he think the bowler and batsman are 1 metre apart?
I'm not understanding your comparison here.
I realize that. I am saying that I don't understand how this camera phenomenon equates to seeing something in the sky with your own eyes. The OP also took photos without a zoom.Certain low angles in sports make it look like things are much closer to each other than they really are.
I can assure you that anyone taking that picture would recognise a jet by sound if not by sight.it's size cannot be determined unless you're someone who happens to know it is a military jet.
There’s three weeks between the sightings, though, if the dates are accurate. Helium balloons don’t stay inflated for that long.Could be the same object, its not that far over the pennies from East Manchester to South Yorks
I'm not understanding your comparison here. Many experienced pilots have trouble deciphering the size of objects against the sky. Even Dreyfuss, in Jaws, made Brody walk to the end of the plank for 'scale' in his shot with an ocean background.
ehm, he couldnt? and he didnt asserted it;But I still ask, how can he determine the size of 'his object' being bigger than the balloons size?
sounds for me that he just assumed it. but of course there still lies a question.he thought it was bigger than that
But I still ask, how can he determine the size of 'his object' being bigger than the balloons size?