Illuminati symbolism and numerology, like in the olympics

Presumably you are aware that in most masonic traditions there is a mode of rank which is done by degrees. In most, the highest level a mason can get to is the 33rd degree.

So the fact that the OG organizing committee had its office at 33 Queen St would just be a coincidence, yes?

Yes, just like if it had been at 11, 23, 77, 911, or 666 Queen Street. If you look for coincidences you will find them.
 
That has got to be an eye opener.

I think you miss the point. If that was the ONLY day he mentioned it, then there might be something. But since it was in just about every speech he gave that year, then of course it's also going to be in his address to congress.
 
I think you miss the point. If that was the ONLY day he mentioned it, then there might be something. But since it was in just about every speech he gave that year, then of course it's also going to be in his address to congress.

I think his speech was entitled 'Towards a new world order'....
 
I think you miss the point. If that was the ONLY day he mentioned it, then there might be something. But since it was in just about every speech he gave that year, then of course it's also going to be in his address to congress.
Are you talking about the famous george herbert walker bush speech at 9:09 primetime? it's the only time I'm familiar he made that famous broadcast but I havent looked into it.
 
I watched it, I listened to it. There were 11 'priestesses' and a number of dancers/performers. Keep scraping that barrel of yours. lol!

Nice try...

I watched it too...there were only women in the temple when the High Priestess Ino Menegaki lit the flame....and there were more than 11.

You can try to call them performers/dancers if that helps assuage your failure...but they entered with her and left with her. They were priestess'

Perhaps you only counted up to 11 and confirmed your bias...but there were more than 11 priestess'.

"LOL"



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-sT_aryigg
 
Originally Posted by lee h oswald

Lord Coe's office is at 33 Queen St - he's the man in charge. But it's just a coincidence, right?

Do you think it was not? In what way?


Yes, just like if it had been at 11, 23, 77, 911, or 666 Queen Street. If you look for coincidences you will find them.

So the 33ft high Lady Godiva commissioned from designer Zandra Rhodes for the Olympics was also coincidentally 33ft high?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Are you talking about the famous george herbert walker bush speech at 9:09 primetime? it's the only time I'm familiar he made that famous broadcast but I havent looked into it.

It was made on 9/11/90 - 11 years to the day....his speech began at 9.09 pm - it is recorded in this way.
 
Nice try...

I watched it too...there were only women in the temple when the High Priestess Ino Menegaki lit the flame....and there were more than 11.

You can try to call them performers/dancers if that helps assuage your failure...but they entered with her and left with her. They were priestess'

Perhaps you only counted up to 11 and confirmed your bias...but there were more than 11 priestess'.

"LOL"



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-sT_aryigg

You're wrong, but even if you were right - let's say you are. Fine. What about the rest of it?
 
So to go with 33 Queen St and a 33ft high Lady Godiva - what else we got?

How about this: on the Olympic site at Stratford in London, before construction works could begin there were 33 industrial buildings that had to be demolished. It's just a coincidence right?
 
So to go with 33 Queen St and a 33ft high Lady Godiva - what else we got?

How about this: on the Olympic site at Stratford in London, before construction works could begin there were 33 industrial buildings that had to be demolished. It's just a coincidence right?

These coincidences are just coincidences - they happen all the time - here's another

A pensioned couple in London refused to pay the Olympic surcharge on their council tax bill at risk of prison - how much was that for? £33.33

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ell-jail-pay-33-Games-tax-say-pensioners.html

It's a coincidence, right?
 
So to go with 33 Queen St and a 33ft high Lady Godiva - what else we got?

How about this: on the Olympic site at Stratford in London, before construction works could begin there were 33 industrial buildings that had to be demolished. It's just a coincidence right?

torture the data until it confesses...

Over all 200 buildings had to be demolished for Olympic Park to be built...

Coincidence?
 
If you take any significantly large set of numbers such as: 3, 7, 9, 11, 13, 33, 39... "or any derivatives thereof" it's a trivial matter to connect events with them. With enough time, imagination and data mining skills, just about any events can be linked. Just because events may have a relationship to some numbers, it does not mean the events are related to each other.

BTW did anyone notice my post #283 was made at 10:03? 2 + 8 + 3 = 10 + 03 = 13. How in the world could anyone possibly conclude that is a coincidence?

Anyway, this has been fun but I'm tired of being trolled.
 
These coincidences are just coincidences - they happen all the time - here's another

A middle-aged couple in London refused to pay the Olympic surcharge on their council tax bill at risk of prison - how much was that for? £33.33

It's a coincidence, right?

Yes of course it is. Pick any number, and you'll start seeing it crop up everywhere. It's a coincidence. Spend enough time obsessing over it and you'll amass a collection of coincidence.
 
torture the data until it confesses...

Over all 200 buildings had to be demolished for Olympic Park to be built...

Coincidence?

Sorry. No coincidence....

Video: London 2012 Olympics: time lapse of Olympic stadium turf ...

www.telegraph.co.uk/.../olympics/olympicsvideo/.../L...6 Apr 2012
33 buildings on the Olympic Stadium site had been demolished and over 800,000 tonnes of soil was taken ...
More videos for 33 buildings on olympic site »



What was that you said?
 
You're wrong, but even if you were right - let's say you are. Fine. What about the rest of it?

Ha, it's the classic theorist defense. "all the mistakes don't matter, because we have so much evidence". It's like Richard Gauge's ramble when he was shown that steel beams could actually quickly collapse from a kerosene fire.

"This is the reason I say it's irrelevant, because they have experiments like this that show that steel weakens in fires, it's easier and more profound for me to say 'it's irrelevant', you can turn the steel into a noodle, I will still, we still have the evidence of explosive controlled demolition."
Content from External Source
8:35 here:


Not until every last shred of "evidence" is perfectly addressed will you be convinced, and since there's an infinite number of points you can raise, there's no end to it.
 
Ha, it's the classic theorist defense. "all the mistakes don't matter, because we have so much evidence". It's like Richard Gauge's ramble when he was shown that steel beams could actually quickly collapse from a kerosene fire.

"This is the reason I say it's irrelevant, because they have experiments like this that show that steel weakens in fires, it's easier and more profound for me to say 'it's irrelevant', you can turn the steel into a noodle, I will still, we still have the evidence of explosive controlled demolition."
Content from External Source
8:35 here:

Not until every last shred of "evidence" is perfectly addressed will you be convinced, and since there's an infinite number of points you can raise, there's no end to it.

Actually, I said he was wrong - but let's pretend you're not.

I've seen this video before. The one with the very skinny, non-fireproofed very long piece of steel put into an inferno! That proves absolutely nothing - except maybe someone was trying to misrepresent the reality of it. lol
 
Originally Posted by lee h oswald

So to go with 33 Queen St and a 33ft high Lady Godiva - what else we got?

How about this: on the Olympic site at Stratford in London, before construction works could begin there were 33 industrial buildings that had to be demolished. It's just a coincidence right?
These coincidences are just coincidences - they happen all the time - here's another

A pensioned couple in London refused to pay the Olympic surcharge on their council tax bill at risk of prison - how much was that for? £33.33

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ensioners.html

It's a coincidence, right?

What else we got? Errr...

The IOC considered changes to 33 sports before the 2012 games....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh yes, and the great fact it is the 30th Olympic Games. Is that suspicious to you as well?

Any way we can move all these numerology posts to a new topic? Last I checked this was about Bilderberg, not about the number 3 in the Olympics.
 
Yes? And? So? What?

Um, that's kind of what I'm wondering at this point. So, the Powers That Be decided to use all of these nefarious symbolic numbers . . . why? It's not like it's exactly a secret. I mean, apparently anyone can just look at the whole thing, add up the numbers and realize that they're up to no good. What's the point of that?

eta: I agree with plane. This portion of the thread definitely deserves a boot to the Off-Topic folder.
 
Back
Top