Latest activity

  • Y
    yoshy reacted to FatPhil's post in the thread Major UFO experiences are specific to the observer with Informative Informative.
    Oooh, I know this one as I just watched a video on it, linked to from page 9 of the accidentally-attached PDF here: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/aguadilla-infrared-footage-of-ufos-probably-hot-air-wedding-lanterns.8952/post-374048 : Source...
  • John J.
    Off-topic a bit,, but a tin or aluminium plate would be light, cheap and easy to punch a hole through for a suspension point. They were very common in the 20th century.
  • John J.
    I think very few people here are saying that anything beyond the current paradigm is theoretically impossible. But that's beside the point—and ultimately irrelevant. Whether someone believes or disbelieves something doesn't change reality...
  • Dave51c
    I think very few people here are saying that anything beyond the current paradigm is theoretically impossible. But that's beside the point—and ultimately irrelevant. Whether someone believes or disbelieves something doesn't change reality...
  • NorCal Dave
    I think very few people here are saying that anything beyond the current paradigm is theoretically impossible. But that's beside the point—and ultimately irrelevant. Whether someone believes or disbelieves something doesn't change reality...
  • Gary C
    I think very few people here are saying that anything beyond the current paradigm is theoretically impossible. But that's beside the point—and ultimately irrelevant. Whether someone believes or disbelieves something doesn't change reality...
  • Ann K
    I think very few people here are saying that anything beyond the current paradigm is theoretically impossible. But that's beside the point—and ultimately irrelevant. Whether someone believes or disbelieves something doesn't change reality...
  • S
    The truther is using an inadequate model with less internal structure than the WTC, and hence massively stronger walls by comparison. The WTC facade would not have stood up by itself. The paper model is definitely strong enough to withstand a...
  • S
    It may blow the minds of people who do not understand that wind loads (lateral forces; bend the whole structure, tend to increase loads low on the downwind side) and gravity loads are two different things, structurally dealt with in different...
  • S
    We are seeing the umpteenth recycling of a feature of discussion we have had on multiple previous occasions. What are we (i.e. the modeller) trying to achieve? Something that looks like the collapses, or something that replicates the physics...
  • S
    it boggles the mind that you felt the need to say this Normal people don't require a trick. They understand that when an airliner crashed into a building that then burned for quite some time, it is substantially weakened and can collapse. That's...
  • Mick West
    I think very few people here are saying that anything beyond the current paradigm is theoretically impossible. But that's beside the point—and ultimately irrelevant. Whether someone believes or disbelieves something doesn't change reality...
Back
Top