I think very few people here are saying that anything beyond the current paradigm is theoretically impossible. But that's beside the point—and ultimately irrelevant. Whether someone believes or disbelieves something doesn't change reality...
Do not paraphrase. If you have evidence supporting your claims, present them. Making vague references as to what people have stated or done is not allowed.
I think very few people here are saying that anything beyond the current paradigm is theoretically impossible. But that's beside the point—and ultimately irrelevant. Whether someone believes or disbelieves something doesn't change reality...
Correction: "looking for corroborative evidence" is NOT good science, unless they also acknowledge the misses as well as the hits. Did that ever happen? And I had no idea what you later added in your profile.
We know that mundane explanations...
Being unable to prove a negative is not significant, though. Of course you can't do that. The significant bitil is the statement that the data does not prove the hypothesis under discussion...
This older starlink tutorial will probably be updated eventually
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkzRJQ3rWa0
There's a help docuement built-in to Sitrec (Help/Documentation)
https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec/docs/Starlink.html
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slA7aV2Mags
I've started a series of tutorial videos to get people more quickly up to speed with using Sitrec. The above one on the user Interface should be the starting point (even if you've used Sitrec...
Being unable to prove a negative is not significant, though. Of course you can't do that. The significant bitil is the statement that the data does not prove the hypothesis under discussion...
That statement bothers me.
If that belief affects us all, if that belief means that (for a real-life current example) our taxpayer money goes toward UFO studies instead of fighting wildfires, then that "entitlement" of one group of believers...
Being unable to prove a negative is not significant, though. Of course you can't do that. The significant bitil is the statement that the data does not prove the hypothesis under discussion...