There are several interviews (in Swedish) with Clas in which he is asked about the recent "drone waves." For the most part, he is rather dismissive. One example is an article published by SVT, Sweden's national public broadcaster, on 24 September...
Reminds me, I once saw an ant franticly running to and fro across the end of a chocolate bar wrapper.
"What are you doing?" I asked.
"It says 'tear along dotted line'," he replied.
Your experiences have no bearing. Moon is a silly trick I could have looked up. I told you to look at illustrations. You all have indeed taught me a lot.
On a different note, I’ve enjoyed interacting with you, Eburacum, all these years. Take care...
Indeed, but I hope that I have successfully demonstrated to you that at least one part of your account is in error, since the Moon is considerably smaller than a dime held at arms' length, and you also say the 'orbs' were each smaller than the...
I would note that, at least to me, that does not satisfy your "of what exactly" question. Such evasion is disingenuous, so that particular individual doesn't seem to be acting 100% in good faith.
They went on Newsnation with Ben Hansen to talk about the Robert Klein - Fairfield County, CT - 2022 Orb UFO
And did they a presentation at the conference when they were sure it wasn't a plane...
They went on Newsnation with Ben Hansen to talk about the Robert Klein - Fairfield County, CT - 2022 Orb UFO
And did they a presentation at the conference when they were sure it wasn't a plane...
Indeed, but I hope that I have successfully demonstrated to you that at least one part of your account is in error, since the Moon is considerably smaller than a dime held at arms' length, and you also say the 'orbs' were each smaller than the...
If they would find demonstrating their integrity, rigour, and honesty to the wider scientific community "embarassing", that would scream cognitive dissonance to me - "I'm happy doing science properly, but I'm embarassed doing science properly"...
Hi all,
I have been reading through some threads here for a while and the one thing i do not really understand is how NIST calculated the dynamic amplification factor.
They fully explain the static calculation but after watching the Mick West...
It shouldn't though, and it shouldn't stop them if they are trying to turn 'UAP Studies' into a serious and honest scientific effort. Identifying Type I errors (false positives) is one of the most important aspects of scientific research because...
It is unavoidable. The process starts with presumably a thing out in the world external to you, which is then detected by your eyes, and is interpreted, processed, stored, recalled and then relayed to others by your brain and typing fingers...