It seems like we cannot determine any real shape behind that blurry dot.
It reminds me of the Beaver Drone UFO, which turned out to be probably poplar fluff, close to the camera.
This cannot be the same thing, but rather the same phenomenon? An...
Sure, that's possible, but it's also true that to get those movements, you'd either have to film a screen really badly, or do it on purpose by moving the camera around to fake them.
I don’t believe that is what’s happening, but there’s no way I...
Motion blur can of course also happen when the camera filming it, is moving fast with respect to the "area of high contrast". In my view this video is (as almost as per normal) just not giving enough information to make conclusive identification...
Motion blur can of course also happen when the camera filming it, is moving fast with respect to the "area of high contrast". In my view this video is (as almost as per normal) just not giving enough information to make conclusive identification...
You mean, unlike our DoD, with "serious" people like Elizondo, Stratton, Stublebine, Channing, Grusch, Gallaudet, Barber and a host of others? I would assume the MoD has similar "serious" people. The late Nick Pope, a MoD civilian really created...
If nothing else. these pictures might be useful to show to the "jetfuel can't melt steel beams" crowd... apparently the jet fuel is not necessary if the load is sufficient...
Better documented, but there is a tiny hitch in that.
Look at the linked article, the photo appears twice.
In one image the Lightning is two plane lengths from the tree tops.
In the other it is one plane length from the tree tops. Presumably to...
Agreed. We have French UFO researcher @Baptiste Fr making similar claims in the French UFO assembly thread. He repeatedly emphasized the importance of witness testimony. Yet once again, here is a prime example of supposedly accurate witness...
A pilot ejecting from his jet captured about one second before impact.
The story behind a famous photo of an ejection from a RAF Lightning interceptor
By Dario Leone
Aug 7 2018
The featured image in this post was taken by Jim Meads on Sep. 13...
The video appears to be zoomed in quite a lot, but judging by the motion blur of the object, I suspect we’re not seeing additional camera movements (for the “camera filming a screen” hypothesis).
Parallax could be responsible for some movements...
Agreed. We have French UFO researcher @Baptiste Fr making similar claims in the French UFO assembly thread. He repeatedly emphasized the importance of witness testimony. Yet once again, here is a prime example of supposedly accurate witness...
An often-stated warning is "Don't be so open-minded that your brain falls out" ...which would seem to be a warning unheeded by those who uncritically embrace woo and think of those who insist on material facts as being the short-sighted ones.