It happens around the time when the objects stop moving from left to right in the frame and just before the drone start banking the other way. I think a change in the angle of reflected light is more likely.
People have been dismissing the bird hypothesis because of the formation that is not V-shaped enough in their opinion.
If we can compare with PR016 which was resolved as birds, we see flattish formations are possible ...
A very common misconception; there was some terrible science communication (about the lack of crystaline structure in glass) back in the mid-1900s that unfortunately has set hard, and refused to flow away.
Glass Is Not a Slow-Flowing Liquid — Old...
It happens around the time when the objects stop moving from left to right in the frame and just before the drone start banking the other way. I think a change in the angle of reflected light is more likely.
A very common misconception; there was some terrible science communication (about the lack of crystaline structure in glass) back in the mid-1900s that unfortunately has set hard, and refused to flow away.
Glass Is Not a Slow-Flowing Liquid — Old...
I think that's more common than not in heavily-glassed buildings. True, some glass may be bowed by stress, but bear in mind that glass is like a liquid in solid form. Old windows get thicker at the bottom as they slump with age.
Glass buildings...
People have been dismissing the bird hypothesis because of the formation that is not V-shaped enough in their opinion.
If we can compare with PR016 which was resolved as birds, we see flattish formations are possible ...
I'm guessing that whoever submits a UAP image/ video to AARO isn't obliged to consider the pattern of diffraction spikes that the imaging system might show. But I'm a bit disappointed that AARO doesn't comment on what are obviously diffraction...