I don't know if this side discussion counts as a side track, but atmospheric testing ended in 1963, while these samples date from 1966. That is enough time for new growth to occur that does not include atmospheric Cs-137. A plant biologist might...
That's not how parallax works. Nor how perspective works.
(cue the Father Ted clip. It does NOT say "small and far away".)
But you can count on the UFO witness in your story to fail to take a clear photo. :p
I don't know if this side discussion counts as a side track, but atmospheric testing ended in 1963, while these samples date from 1966. That is enough time for new growth to occur that does not include atmospheric Cs-137. A plant biologist might...
I don't know if this side discussion counts as a side track, but atmospheric testing ended in 1963, while these samples date from 1966. That is enough time for new growth to occur that does not include atmospheric Cs-137. A plant biologist might...
I don't know if this side discussion counts as a side track, but atmospheric testing ended in 1963, while these samples date from 1966. That is enough time for new growth to occur that does not include atmospheric Cs-137. A plant biologist might...
I don't know if this side discussion counts as a side track, but atmospheric testing ended in 1963, while these samples date from 1966. That is enough time for new growth to occur that does not include atmospheric Cs-137. A plant biologist might...
From RobertBillyBob's (by the way, one of the better handles) summery (my bold):
While not using the word "stigma" here, it is the same old argument put forth from the UFO world and something that has been discussed multiple times on this...
Hello, all. I've been an admirer of Mick and the team here at Metabunk for many years. Happy to join this group of logical, polite and data-driven skeptics.