The key point that we can take from @Harabeck 's post is that both pilots and non-pilots find it difficult to identify and describe airborne things that they have never seen before. Clearly the pilots will be more familiar with things in the sky...
There is indeed a pattern of pilots seeing stuff they either can't identify, or that they attribute to something erroneously. However, on further post-flight analysis the things that can be identified have turned out to be entirely prosaic albeit...
I feel like this case deserves real emphasis when we talk about pilots being reliable witnesses. This was not an object in the air with no references. They knew the approximate distance and speed (on the ground at road speeds at most), and they...
As noted in the old comment I linked to, there have been reports that looked into this, including Hynek's 1978 report. His conclusion, which seems consistent with the many examples we have discussed here and elsewhere, is that pilots are good at...
Forgive me for replying to whole quote instead of selected parts, but I find trying to do this on a phone exceedingly frustrating.
It would seem the guys from CAPCODA and the French Air Force Sid there are NO anomalous UAP beyond likely...
Was it just me or was that just more confused and confusing than anything else?
random thoughts and paraphrasing below:
Avi was tasked by the government to investigate the videos that are being released by the government, but we are actually...
The key point that we can take from @Harabeck 's post is that both pilots and non-pilots find it difficult to identify and describe airborne things that they have never seen before. Clearly the pilots will be more familiar with things in the sky...
The key point that we can take from @Harabeck 's post is that both pilots and non-pilots find it difficult to identify and describe airborne things that they have never seen before. Clearly the pilots will be more familiar with things in the sky...
The key point that we can take from @Harabeck 's post is that both pilots and non-pilots find it difficult to identify and describe airborne things that they have never seen before. Clearly the pilots will be more familiar with things in the sky...
The key point that we can take from @Harabeck 's post is that both pilots and non-pilots find it difficult to identify and describe airborne things that they have never seen before. Clearly the pilots will be more familiar with things in the sky...