Interestingly I am a trained bird observer yet when I say things are gulls over on the Reddit UFO page no-one accepts my trained observer credentials..
Jeez I forgot to mention "living flying things" in my previous list!
Edit:
I think I'm a good bird observer, not trained.
I can't recognize 5000 species, but if it has wings and feathers, I can point to it and say "bird!".
Interestingly I am a trained bird observer yet when I say things are gulls over on the Reddit UFO page no-one accepts my trained observer credentials..
Interestingly I am a trained bird observer yet when I say things are gulls over on the Reddit UFO page no-one accepts my trained observer credentials..
Exactly. We see this all the time. In criminal investigations, everyone who was at a specific location at a certain time must be interviewed, regardless of whether they believe they have anything important to say. This almost never happens when...
An issue seldom addressed is that this interview process will usually leave out witnesses who saw the same thing and interpreted it as "Oh look, an airplane" and forgot about it because it was not interesting
I kind of agree. Witnesses are wasting their time without sharing evidence - skeptics tend to become convinced that a claim is true whenever they are shown evidence that supports the claim. People can claim anything, and using words to describe...
Well done.
In the "Moist_Cartographer" video, the camera is pointed just west of due south.
That means they were both looking in the direction of this approximate section of Fuller Road...
Well done.
In the "Moist_Cartographer" video, the camera is pointed just west of due south.
That means they were both looking in the direction of this approximate section of Fuller Road...
I think one can be trained to look at UFOs and be able to identify some banal and rarer weirder looking phenomena.
For example, being able to distinguish:
- airplanes
- blimps
- drones
- gliders
- helicopters
- satellites, iridium flares...