Latest activity

If there's been a claim of any danger from absorption of the ingredients, then it suffers from the same fatal flaw of the arguments from the anti-vax crowd: any danger of X causing harm is vastly overshadowed by the danger of NOT using X, but the...

When you say you see a plane and "recognize it as such," that's already an interpretation of what you're seeing. Perhaps you're right, perhaps you're wrong. Without independent corroborating evidence, it's impossible to know. We know for a fact...

What might be useful would be for you to select what you consider the single best example of such a picture and start a thread for it. You would not need to enter discussion/debate there unless you wanted to, but it would be useful for us to...

I sort of agree. We can't rule out that an eyewitness might see something unusual that is objectively there, and is able to give a reasonably accurate description that corresponds to what was there. But without corroborating evidence it's...

But every time a sighting is reported, the witness MUST be considered in that light. If the report comes from someone who has often made debunked claims before ("cried wolf" so to speak) then his reliability on a new case is in doubt from the...

Argument from authority fallacy. This site has a history of embarrassing government officials on these cases. See now, I asked you to back up a claim you made. I wanted you to explain what you mean by a "true report". Does that mean you think...

I agree that it looks like a distant landing light on a fixed wing aircraft. It seems to reverse course several times, but that seems to be a parallax illusion, because the guy taking the video walks from side to side. The tree branches are...

Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1ud4vfe/strange_glowing_orb_no_sound_emitting_a_bright/ This was posted to Reddit Geo-located to here https://maps.app.goo.gl/9rkmJ9u1ov2WPMhX9 as per OPs maps Original video was requested and...

If there's been a claim of any danger from absorption of the ingredients, then it suffers from the same fatal flaw of the arguments from the anti-vax crowd: any danger of X causing harm is vastly overshadowed by the danger of NOT using X, but the...

What might be useful would be for you to select what you consider the single best example of such a picture and start a thread for it. You would not need to enter discussion/debate there unless you wanted to, but it would be useful for us to...

What might be useful would be for you to select what you consider the single best example of such a picture and start a thread for it. You would not need to enter discussion/debate there unless you wanted to, but it would be useful for us to...

When you say you see a plane and "recognize it as such," that's already an interpretation of what you're seeing. Perhaps you're right, perhaps you're wrong. Without independent corroborating evidence, it's impossible to know. We know for a fact...

Re-watch. The light is moving from our right to our left, then there is one real course change. It begins to move from our left to our right. There's too much movement relative to the basketball hoop to be explained by a parallax illusion due...

It's just classic Hitchens' Razor: "We have good photos" has been asserted without evidence, so can also be dismissed without evidence.

"We have good photos" is a simple declaration, the truth of which could be demonstrated by showing us some good photos. Then we can turn the analytical skills of dozens of experts on a picture to see if meets the definition of "good" in any way...