Latest activity

I’ve always advocated for Mick being beamed up! Nothing would silence skeptics like a message from Mick surrounded by aliens in a UFO cockpit.

Leaving aside the obvious history of those chosen for this board the selection of apparent skillsets (physics, astronomy, exobiology etc) would seem to have put the conclusions first. I.e. craft exhibiting new physics with aliens from other...

The image Avi chose to illustrate the article : Why not use an image from the PURSUE files to illustrate a survey about the PURSUE files? This is a free setup for an expectation vs reality meme.

You’d have skeptics dropping from space and terrifying fighter pilots?! ;)

I get the vibe that this survey is to show "look, I'm doing work". I assume that the more traction this gets on social media etc the bigger the story and reason behind it will be. Seems like more tactics...not tictacs

Or admittng that there isn't any?

You’d have skeptics dropping from space and terrifying fighter pilots?! ;)

Given that many of the classic, and not so classic, UFO stories are themselves amalgamations that coalesced into their more popular canonical versions, will AI slop of those stories that in turn prompt more AI slop about those stories end up...

This just dislocated both lobes of my brain:

Now, how many skeptics would I like for such a study? To quote someone we all know “a whole fleet of them!”.

Maybe Mick should contact Avi and offer SITREC and his services as an advisor. I’m sure Avi knows about Mick.

Maybe Mick should contact Avi and offer SITREC and his services as an advisor. I’m sure Avi knows about Mick.

So some exposure, then some non-exposure, and then some more exposure, eh? Sounds like double exposure to me. Who cares if the occultation happens because of a mechanical shutter, or a subfusc gown? (Not that I'm saying that's how I did such...

The fact that the orbs are being labeled as "intelligent" feels like a conclusion drawn before having any conclusive data. It doesn't seem like an "unbiased" approach. I believe a serious study on UAPs requires more skeptics on the team. It's...

The fact that the orbs are being labeled as "intelligent" feels like a conclusion drawn before having any conclusive data. It doesn't seem like an "unbiased" approach. I believe a serious study on UAPs requires more skeptics on the team. It's...