Latest activity

It is a really bizarre picture to use, it already sets an expectation that these orb UAP's are adversarial? If you dig into the survey it asks questions around how intimidated you/family/inner circle would be by confirmation of NHI/UAP's. Dying...

This just dislocated both lobes of my brain:

Well, that's not science-fictiony at all! /s Complete with the giant hole-in-the-mountain Secret UFO Base that nobody has ever noticed before ...tell me, is this off the cover of a comic book? To my skeptical eye, this image doesn't advertise...

I looked through the skillsets and noted a couple of regimes missing.. namely folks experienced in photography, photogrammetry and perspective analysis, also optical detection systems (inc FLIR, radar, etc..). Let's face it, I'd suspect that if...

Well, that's not science-fictiony at all! /s Complete with the giant hole-in-the-mountain Secret UFO Base that nobody has ever noticed before ...tell me, is this off the cover of a comic book? To my skeptical eye, this image doesn't advertise...

Will this seminar be live streamed? And it seems like it'll only be in French?

The image Avi chose to illustrate the article : Why not use an image from the PURSUE files to illustrate a survey about the PURSUE files? This is a free setup for an expectation vs reality meme.

Source: https://avi-loeb.medium.com/a-survey-on-public-attitudes-toward-the-pursue-uap-records-release-77816f97553d Not sure why it matters what I think if this is a search for facts. Data sharing with war.gov ?

Back again to @Gaspa's question: "Is it really biased if it tracks with reality?". I think the answer, imperfect an answer though it may be, lies in a comparison of the results of skeptics vs UFOlogists once an identification has been made. So...

I get the vibe that this survey is to show "look, I'm doing work". I assume that the more traction this gets on social media etc the bigger the story and reason behind it will be. Seems like more tactics...not tictacs

This just dislocated both lobes of my brain:

It was a joke of a press conference! The whole thing relied on witness reports from soldiers, and we know how little eyewitness testimony is worth when it isn't accompanied by photos or video. But there were some new timestamps released from...

So some exposure, then some non-exposure, and then some more exposure, eh? Sounds like double exposure to me. Who cares if the occultation happens because of a mechanical shutter, or a subfusc gown? (Not that I'm saying that's how I did such...

This just dislocated both lobes of my brain:

Hello, my name is Baptiste Friscourt, I've been using Metabunk for years to gather analysis on cases. My name started to appear in conversations here, so it seems like a proper time to introduce myself. I'm based in France.