Latest activity

  • M
    Now, my major beef. The idea that "disclosure" would be this huge mind fuck and there'd be mass hysteria. Dogs and cats living together... What a load of crap. It would become the new background noise of daily life. People adapt to terminal...
  • Ann K
    Yes, it does. It means assuming there is a UAP phenomenon that can be studied. If not—if it's just clutter in the LIZ and system malfunctions—then there's simply nothing there to study. And the comparison with Bigfoot isn't that far-fetched, I...
  • Todd Feinman
    You all routinely make fun of folks who have seen UFOs. It's a spectrum like scientists. And you lump in bad scientists with experiencers. And you base your entire judgement of the phenomenon on the crap the government releases, which is why I've...
  • John J.
    John J. reacted to RTM's post in the thread Signatures - Get rid of them? with Like Like.
    Yeah, from the below scene in The Life of Brian. I first saw the film I was a teenager, and having grown up in Ireland the film was notorious as it was kind of banned. Good old Channel 4 (the downfall of many a young teen male) showed it and when...
  • Todd Feinman
    Why? All of your about pages are empty. And many don’t use your real names.
  • John J.
    I'd guess many posters here are more interested in, and have a greater knowledge of, reports of UFOs, aliens and other strange phenomena than the average member of the public. People are also fascinated by zombies and vampires. It's hard to make...
  • flarkey
    What are the Dept of War doing releasing iPhone footage taken by a civilian? With no audio or geolocation. (first video on the list FBI-UAP-PR003, "Orbs Over the Pond," 2024 What a joke. EDIT: "The FBI assess the individuals who reported this...
  • RTM
    RTM replied to the thread Signatures - Get rid of them?.
    Yeah, from the below scene in The Life of Brian. I first saw the film I was a teenager, and having grown up in Ireland the film was notorious as it was kind of banned. Good old Channel 4 (the downfall of many a young teen male) showed it and when...
  • JMartJr
    I think you're right, but that's not the whole truth. The best daylight UFO photos ever were taken in the 1950s and 1960s. Shiny discs hovering over the landscape, complete with antennas and windows. Obviously, they were all fakes, but they did...
  • JMartJr
    That was my first impression. Sky lanterns.
  • JMartJr
    Yes, it's from here: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/ica-uap-d001-and-fb-uap-pr004-caison-bests-fort-carson-uap-report.14412/ Obvious sky lanterns. Excessive deference to the witness.
  • Z.W. Wolf
    Now, my major beef. The idea that "disclosure" would be this huge mind fuck and there'd be mass hysteria. Dogs and cats living together... What a load of crap. It would become the new background noise of daily life. People adapt to terminal...
  • RTM
    RTM reacted to NoParty's post in the thread Signatures - Get rid of them? with Like Like.
    Me too. I don't care either way, on whether we have signatures or not...so long as they're limited to Monty Python films...
  • RTM
    RTM reacted to John J.'s post in the thread Signatures - Get rid of them? with Like Like.
    @RTM's signature always makes me smile. Well, provides a tiny lift. "there shall, in that time, be rumors of things going astray, errrm, and there shall be a great confusion as to where things really are" To me, it gently reflects some of the...
  • Z.W. Wolf
    I've looked at a lot of reviews... Same things come up in the negative reviews: Too much clunky exposition. Breaks the 'show don't tell' rule. Takes itself very seriously but doesn't really have anything to say. Cliched, sophomoric stuff...
Back
Top