Latest activity

@John J. I'm not talking globally. How could that even be tested? I'm referring to the discussion within the topic (fringe!). Eeriness nearly always comes up when people discuss the book. By many accounts it's "wrong" as a depiction of an alien...

From that article by Stephen Jay Gould; Human evolutionary development has been affected by neoteny as a process, especially over the last three million years or so; this process (if extended into the distant future) could produce something like...

I don't get this either. How many "unconventional explanations" can be credibly deemed to be "resolved" with a high degree of confidence? This is at odds with the preponderance of poor evidence, e.g. low resolution IR zoomed videos of fuzzy...

The segment in question The video quality is quite a bit better than Corbell releases, you can actually see the interlacing artifacts, so it's much closer to the original, and you can see: Which is also what the Sitrec analysis shows.

From the video description on the website: A user uploaded this video to a classified network in June 2024.

I think it's the original footage, just reencoded, so not filmed off a monitor. The various contrast issues are problems with the original IR camera.

Do you think that this 'official' version has not been filmed off a monitor?

Thanks for the explanation! It's very clear and concise.

The segment in question The video quality is quite a bit better than Corbell releases, you can actually see the interlacing artifacts, so it's much closer to the original, and you can see: Which is also what the Sitrec analysis shows.

The segment in question The video quality is quite a bit better than Corbell releases, you can actually see the interlacing artifacts, so it's much closer to the original, and you can see: Which is also what the Sitrec analysis shows.

I think we are starting to see the dawning realization that releasing videos is not the Great Disclosure people were hoping for. So Burlison is pivoting to that other concept, the government gave everything away to companies and universities. So...

Would it be fair to translate that as "Made to look much more impressive than it actually was, for reasons one can guess at but which are not stated?" At least the original is retained, but the folks over in Big UFO have een given a gift in the...

One possibility would be a relatively wide ribbon. Which would also account for how it is more visible at some times than others, if the balloon is rotating ans so the ribbon is sometimes seen more edge-on. It is undeniably there, whatever it...

@John J. I'm not talking globally. How could that even be tested? I'm referring to the discussion within the topic (fringe!). Eeriness nearly always comes up when people discuss the book. By many accounts it's "wrong" as a depiction of an alien...

I apologize for the rather sloppy typing in that post, with "here" in place of "hear," parentheses opened but never closed, etc. It was typed on my phone in the back of a theater during a break in a fundraising event, in a bit of a rush, and I...