I'm not seeing much newly-visible in the new scan -- other than, being a bit less contrast-y, it looks more like a bubble or drop of water or such.
Just quoting the above in hopes that the documentarians were aware of it, and looked at it as...
Thanks, I'd totally missed that down in the video description.
On the biggest screen I have, I don't see any of the orbs but I did notice one thing -- they/it tends to be in the same place every time, according to the red arrow. That suggests a...
I guess the reasoning would be a non-rotating object with a reflective surface only visible in one direction would either be non-transient or not visible depending on its orientation. Why alien designers build rotating satellites with one highly...
It strikes me that the problem with this approach of looking for more sky survey-like material shot in the same way with similar technology at the same time is that the analysis is also likely to repeat any flaws in the original papers.
That is...
It strikes me that the problem with this approach of looking for more sky survey-like material shot in the same way with similar technology at the same time is that the analysis is also likely to repeat any flaws in the original papers.
That is...
Thank you Mick and everyone for your replies.
I'm happy to share the original 21:51 orb photo publicly so everyone can examine it.
Here is the untouched original file taken during the missing-time window (I have zero memory of taking this...
Thank you Mick for taking the time to reply and for looking into this.
I'm sorry the long video made it confusing. I added a very detailed chapter index specifically so people don't have to watch the whole thing — you can jump straight to the...
They appear to have used digital scans (again) of the Hamburger Sternwarte Großer Schmidtspiegel 1.2-m camera.
One issue with the Palomar scans was that it was impossible to check the original plates for emulsion artefacts becasue they had all...
It strikes me that the problem with this approach of looking for more sky survey-like material shot in the same way with similar technology at the same time is that the analysis is also likely to repeat any flaws in the original papers.
That is...
Sorry, John, you have posted a very long and confusing video, and if you want people to help, you need to be a lot clearer about exactly where the UFO is. At this point, I still have no idea what you mean by "the 21:51 photo"
Why not post this...
It strikes me that the problem with this approach of looking for more sky survey-like material shot in the same way with similar technology at the same time is that the analysis is also likely to repeat any flaws in the original papers.
That is...