Latest activity

From just a quick comparison it looks like a better scan of the negative (positive, whatever) but without all the post-scan retouching. Here inset is detail of an older published image (left) the previous retouched "drum scan" (right) overlaid...

https://f.io/VgCvZPtM expanded https://next.frame.io/share/f626bc7c-ecd5-4944-b5bf-9d20e4e05366/61a64ed6-af93-429d-af64-6665bb3c0753 The second one may be the best option (PNG, 530 MB). The close-up:

But Fitzgerald in SUNlite concluded that they were Canadian. In fact it's a key part of his "solution" because he says it's the reason the culprits never owned up to it - because they didn't know, having gone home to Canada.

Sorry I was unclear... "In at least the same general time frame and going the same direction" was to refer to the following reports and descriptions, not the preceding one. Mea culpa. He reported a bunch of planes together in a bunch. That's...

Sorry, John, you have posted a very long and confusing video, and if you want people to help, you need to be a lot clearer about exactly where the UFO is. At this point, I still have no idea what you mean by "the 21:51 photo" Why not post this...

I was going to put it on the "rare things" thread, but then I thought it might be AI generated

Apparently there's a new Doco on the pic etc. They claim there is a new drum scan photo of it they found. It's all in this tweet, I dont care enough about this case to dig it all p. Just posting this here for those interested "the team...

It strikes me that the problem with this approach of looking for more sky survey-like material shot in the same way with similar technology at the same time is that the analysis is also likely to repeat any flaws in the original papers. That is...

It strikes me that the problem with this approach of looking for more sky survey-like material shot in the same way with similar technology at the same time is that the analysis is also likely to repeat any flaws in the original papers. That is...

Hi Silverado, welcome. The paper lists one author. It is common for academic/ research papers to have a discussion section. Unless it is clearly stated otherwise, the reader will be under the impression that the discussion section is written by...

It strikes me that the problem with this approach of looking for more sky survey-like material shot in the same way with similar technology at the same time is that the analysis is also likely to repeat any flaws in the original papers. That is...

I guess the reasoning would be a non-rotating object with a reflective surface only visible in one direction would either be non-transient or not visible depending on its orientation. Why alien designers build rotating satellites with one highly...

It strikes me that the problem with this approach of looking for more sky survey-like material shot in the same way with similar technology at the same time is that the analysis is also likely to repeat any flaws in the original papers. That is...

Oh, I'm interested in anything you find about it. At the moment planes seem more likely, to me, but (hard as it is to believe) I' was wrong about something once, so I suppose it could happen again! Anything learnable about the whole Mike Rogers...

Yes. Because the witness descriptions are contradictory, some of them must be wrong. But which ones? Everyone who saw the lights in binoculars or a telescope said they were planes. And the mystery pilot who responded on the radio reportedly...