So, let's get on with it. This evidence was sent to us by a chap called Mick West. He runs uh his own website called metabunk.org. And the dedication of Metabunk is an interesting read. Metabunk is about debunking specific claims of evidence, not arguing the merits of broader theories. So if Metabunk's goal is to debunk ideas, theories, then I have a little bit of a problem with that. I don't want you to debunk it. I want you to scientifically analyze it. And to me what is important is when science is unable don't change the evidence to make it suit known scientific criteria because the evidence is the evidence. Okay. And it and it often, you know, my my my this is my personal thing is that that that that scientists tend to tend to say, well, we know everything, so we'll base all our knowledge on what we know. Of course, you're going to base your knowledge and your hypothesis on what you know, but then the good ones will always go and say and admit there are many things that we don't know. So, a debunking idea I have a problem with. In other words, you're going to state it as fact and eliminate all other ideas in the interests of debunking it. It's not a search for truth. It's a search for debunking claims. I don't like that. Okay? Because we know as humans that we don't know very much at all about us and our existence.
We our minds are very very narrowed as they have been through the ages. They are still as narrow as they were 300 years ago when we didn't know that we were on a spinning ball at part of part of the Milky Way galaxy. Okay. So what I'm saying is that there is so much more to learn. Don't automatically take it just because it appears scientific. This however does appear scientific but it also appears plausible. So from what I saw where I was I provided them with a latitude, longitude, a time and they took that information and they have extrapolated the following data. Not only were these Starlink satellites, they were in fact these guys down here. Uh SL, I assume that stands for Starlink of 4536 or 4478. And another one down there looks like a 3294. Okay, they have actually uh numbered four. I saw four. So, if we look here, that's where I was in Africa, 20 ft above ground level, which is yes, I would say that's a that's accurate. Uh 1,631 ft above mean sea level. That I would say is accurate. The direction in which
I was looking, I thought I was looking a little bit south of the of west, but then again, I didn't have a compass, so I didn't take a true bearing. I'm going to take what they have said as true and they have here seen these Star Link satellites flaring. That's where I was. That's Lake Kuriba there. That is a still image of three of the satellites flaring. Those are the satellites there. And that is the night sky. Those two stars coordinate with those two stars. That star and that star is that star and that star and that bright star there. Here's that star there. Everything Metabunk has presented to me is yeah I I have no contrary evidence. So thank you Mike West. very interesting, absolutely fascinating.
