I'm not here to debate opinions. I guess this bothers Joe.
Not in the least. I am not here to debate with you. I'm not even talking to you. I'm using your replies as a platform in order to talk to others. You can't hear. That's clear. Perhaps they can, perhaps not. But my posts, long as they are, are not for the consumption of those who mock them. They are for all those lurkers who want to learn about stuff but don't want to tangle with the wranglers here. Ever wonder why there are always 10 times more lurkers listed than actual posters? The way you guys mash noobs is why.
Some would rather not go through that for expressing honest doubt. I'm ok with it, so I'm taking their place and opening up stuff so they can see what is going on and decide for themselves instead of you guys making their decisions for them. Contrary opinions are only allowed here as bunkerball practice. Your team unity on every opinion is legendary. Yet you all believe you are freethinkers and come to your own opinions by merely examining the facts. Sounds great inside the tent, but outside the tent folks can see that somehow with all that independence, you all think the same thing.
Even if lurkers disagree with everything I say, they will have a stronger understanding of that which they disagree with, as well as an example of how not to do this debunking shit you folks think you are doing.
My posts are filled with ideas. Your posts are filled with offhand dismissal of those ideas, but no analysis of them to show why they may be wrong. There is no debate because you are incapable of such. It's why your team is so infamous outside the home field disadvantage you think is a shield. It's best expressed in the joke.
What is the only foolproof way to predict where a debunker stands: state your position first.
That's really funny and really sad, but it's really true, to. You guys don't have a position, you only have others' positions to debunk. Beyond that, it's just unexamined slogans and distraction maneuvers.
There's another joke that hits to the heart of it.
Despite fierce denial from skeptics, CT have broken Operation Zebra, proving without dispute that the secret cabal running Operation Zebra not only existed, but who they were specifically and what they had specifically done, all fully documented and verified by independent, unbiased sources.
The first post in response to this story hit the skeptic boards within minutes with the following header. Debunked: Operation Zebra. Surprised at how this could be with such overwhelming evidence clearly supporting the CT, the mystery was cleared up in the body, which said in full:
Do you have any evidence that it was really called Operation Zebra? It could have just been pareidolia. Where is your evidence that it wasn't just an Operation Horse? Can you prove it wasn't?