30 seconds into the presentation -
"I have DVD`s"
I rate this as the
most bunk filled presentation of chemtrail disinformation I have witnessed.
[video=youtube_share;SLxkELX1cog]http://youtu.be/SLxkELX1cog[/video]
Yet the first comment beneath this bunk is this one:
"best chemtrail talk ive seen on the net - spread this around!"
From the video:
"Thought to have begun in the mid 80`s"
"could be for one (or more) purposes" (bio warfare, weather mod, suppress imunity etc)
"Very little direct information available outside personal observation and the odd rumour" (
titter ye may)
3:00 - "If you write to any official body, including Greenpeace, they will deny chemtrails exist, its as simple as that" (
even Greenpeace have sense enough, perhaps the talk should have concluded at that point?)
3:46 - "Rosalind Peterson has collected samples and found barium in them" (?)
5:30 - (as previously quoted) "we know contrails are colourless"
6:15 - "you can see a contrail AND a chemtrail in the same bit of sky" (?) "so you can see we`ve got two different
'compounds' that we are dealing with..."
"This PROVES that somebody is spraying something, in patterns quite often, X`s , parallel lines, triangles..." (triangles?)
7:30 - "you should not be able to see aeroplane contrails from space" (150 miles up?)
8:44 - "42 aeroplanes that left trails in 2 and a half hours over Derby, on a February day" (UK) (2006 he is talking about)
9:15 - "I took this photo of a 'sundog' - it`s caused by ice crystals in the clouds, or chem-crystals in this case, this is a 'chemdog'..."
All of this in this first part of six...
Is this the most bunk filled presentation ever, or has there been a worse one?