Solar Maximum Doom. Hype or real?

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
​Solar Maximum Doom . . . hype or real????

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27ji-NL2Pb4&feature=youtube_gdata_player

http://www.space.com/10906-space-storms-threat.html

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2006/10mar_stormwarning/

-------
Solar Shield--Protecting the North American Power Grid


http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2010/26oct_solarshield/

--------
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4008700...-solar-shield-protect-power-grids-sun-storms/
----------
http://www.space.com/9484-nasa-solar-shield-protect-power-grids-sun-storms.html

 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I think the key words there are "slightly scary". We've always known about this potential problem. There's little political will to do anything about it, so people talk it up a bit. But if there's a massive solar storm there will be no "doom", just a bunch of problems, inconveniences, and economic impact.

Something you can recover from in 4-10 years is not "doom" any more than 9/11 was doom. It was just a huge event with lots of consequences. And a minor event is more likely. Personally I'm more worried about asteroids.
 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
I think the key words there are "slightly scary". We've always known about this potential problem. There's little political will to do anything about it, so people talk it up a bit. But if there's a massive solar storm there will be no "doom", just a bunch of problems, inconveniences, and economic impact.

Something you can recover from in 4-10 years is not "doom" any more than 9/11 was doom. It was just a huge event with lots of consequences. And a minor event is more likely. Personally I'm more worried about asteroids.

While I don't disagree . . .seems like this was the most intense campaign I have seen from NASA regarding global consequences . . . and of course Hollywood added their drama in Knowing . . .

 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Really? It hardly seems like a big campaign to me. Certainly no more than is warranted.
 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
Really? It hardly seems like a big campaign to me. Certainly no more than is warranted.
So what is your feeling about the probability of a 2 Trillion dollar hiccup between now and say the end of 2014 . . . ????

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40087000...ds-sun-storms/
 

solrey

Senior Member.
Michio Kaku is a media whore who twists real science into his particular version of sensationalism. What kind of journalist drags out a theoretical physicist specializing in string theory to talk about solar physics? What kind of scientist, other than a media whore, would even agree to do an interview covering a subject far outside their area of expertise? There are plenty of solar physicists out there that could have been interviewed.

Lazy Journalists and Media Whores

In the post at Phyrangula, Myers shows a video of Kaku talking about evolution and wonders if he's an idiot because what he's saying betrays a complete ignorance of evolutionary biology. I was reminded of this because a couple of days ago, I was in my car listening to NPR and who were they quoting about the Japanese earthquake? That's right, Dr. Michio Kaku.


The potential for geomagnetic storms to damage electrical grids is real, however there is an ongoing international effort to monitor solar activity and protect critical infrastructure.

Managing Critical Disasters in the Transatlantic Domain – The Case of a Geomagnetic Storm

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is pleased to have had the opportunity to
partner with the European Union, European Commission, Swedish government, U.S. National
Weather Service (NWS), and the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA) to
discuss readiness for a widespread, catastrophic disaster—a geomagnetic storm.
[..]
The Workshop on Managing Critical Disasters in the Transatlantic Domain – The Case of a
Geomagnetic Storm strengthened transatlantic emergency management ties and increased
awareness among both U.S. and EU stakeholders of the dangers posed by severe space weather.

Workshop participants accomplished the workshop objectives and identified several specific
opportunities for stakeholders to increase preparedness and enhance transatlantic ties and
communication. While these areas were identified within the context of a space weather event,
workshop participants agreed that there were improvements to be made across all-hazards
planning.

Some early predictions for Solar Cycle 24 indicated it would be the most intense in fifty years and those were the predictions that the media focused on. Certain scientists and the media hyped those predictions into doom and gloom scenarios. They were wrong. Predictions for SC24 were systematically downgraded as it became evident that this was not going to be a strong cycle. The latest prediction from NASA states SC24 will be the weakest cycle in a hundred years.

http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml

The current prediction for Sunspot Cycle 24 gives a smoothed sunspot number maximum of about 60 in the Spring of 2013. We are currently over three years into Cycle 24. The current predicted size makes this the smallest sunspot cycle in about 100 years.

The original hype has blown up in their faces, imo.
 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
Michio Kaku is a media whore who twists real science into his particular version of sensationalism. What kind of journalist drags out a theoretical physicist specializing in string theory to talk about solar physics? What kind of scientist, other than a media whore, would even agree to do an interview covering a subject far outside their area of expertise? There are plenty of solar physicists out there that could have been interviewed.

Lazy Journalists and Media Whores




The potential for geomagnetic storms to damage electrical grids is real, however there is an ongoing international effort to monitor solar activity and protect critical infrastructure.

Managing Critical Disasters in the Transatlantic Domain – The Case of a Geomagnetic Storm



Some early predictions for Solar Cycle 24 indicated it would be the most intense in fifty years and those were the predictions that the media focused on. Certain scientists and the media hyped those predictions into doom and gloom scenarios. They were wrong. Predictions for SC24 were systematically downgraded as it became evident that this was not going to be a strong cycle. The latest prediction from NASA states SC24 will be the weakest cycle in a hundred years.

http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml



The original hype has blown up in their faces, imo.

Good info . . . why do you think their projections from 2008 were so far off ?? . . . Seems the ultra quiet sun . . . what happened?? Seems someone should have some major egg on their face . . LoL!!!!!!
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Good info . . . why do you think their projections from 2008 were so far off ?? . . . Seems the ultra quiet sun . . . what happened??

It's essentially a weather forecast. Often incorrect, as it's a chaotic system that not well understood or modeled.

A repeat of 1859 is inevitable at some point. It will mess up a bunch of stuff, and we'll move on. And like solrey says, it's not like people are doing nothing about it.
 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
IMO, several appearances on major networks by Carl Sagan's Heir Apparent announcing the potential magnitude of the problem is more than a weather forecast . . . it is an attempt to gain public awareness at the least and purposeful doom mongering at its worst . . . I think someone was dead serious . . .
 

solrey

Senior Member.
IMO, several appearances on major networks by Carl Sagan's Heir Apparent announcing the potential magnitude of the problem is more than a weather forecast . . . it is an attempt to gain public awareness at the least and purposeful doom mongering at its worst . . . I think someone was dead serious . . .

Michio Kaku doesn't hold a candle to Carl Sagan. For somebody who passes themselves off as some kind of know-it-all super-scientiest, Kaku is more of a self-promoting peddler of cowpatties than anything.

There is a reason for the term spaceweather. It's a chaotic system that's actually not well understood, despite the confidence, or arrogance, someone like Kaku might exhibit. What most people who don't follow science closely aren't aware of is there were many different predictions for SC24 from a variety of organizations and university programs, some of them even predicted a weaker than normal cycle but that news isn't "sexy". The problem with mainstream science "journalism" is they tend to focus on the most dramatic sensationalized predictions because it's exciting and draws viewers. In short...doom sells. Remember this year we had a couple of early tornado outbreaks and some were warning about a devastating storm season? How did that work out so far? Heatwaves, drought and a record low number of tornadoes in July.

There is a fleet of spacecraft monitoring solar activity and thanks to the STEREO spacecraft we can now monitor the far side of the sun. SDO provides much more detail of the sun than was previously possible allowing scientists to formulate a better understanding into the processes that affect spaceweather. I believe at this point, all electric utilities have plans to protect their equipment and the grid as a whole in the event of a damaging geomagnetic storm. And thanks to that fleet of spacecraft and ever increasing understanding, we now have enough lead time to take action should a massive CME erupt.

Don't get me wrong, we should be vigilant and prepared for the worst but let's just be honest about the situation.
 

Charlie Primero

Active Member
. . . it is an attempt to gain public awareness at the least and purposeful doom mongering at its worst .

It's a bid for increased funding.

Modern science depends upon government subsidy for sustenance. Government subsidy is driven by mass media. Scare the masses, get more funding. It's an old grift.

The fraudulent nature of the Terror Protection Industry and the Climate Change grift are slowly becoming more well-known to the public. Those who suckle at the government teat need new Boogie Men with which to frighten the public.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
So Charlie, you think there's no danger at all from solar storms? That nothing should be done at all? How about asteroids?

Can't you conceive that SOME scientist might be good people, who actually want to help?
 

Charlie Primero

Active Member
Of course there is danger from solar storms. That's why I subscribe to space weather forecasts and own a Honda backup generator and store gasoline.

I believe most scientists are good people who want to help.

That being said, I also understand political economy and how public policy is formulated and executed.

Have you read Edward Bernays' famous 1928 treatise on Public Relations? If not, I've attached a copy to this post for you.
 

Attachments

  • Propaganda - Edward Bernays.epub.zip
    199.9 KB · Views: 322

Clock

Senior Member.
Honestly, this has happened before. It`s nothing new: it just got lots of excitement because it was supposed to happen in 2012, where lots of CTs used it as evidence. This is what they had to say about them: http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012.html#solar
...solar flares can cause some interruption of satellite communications, although engineers are learning how to build electronics that are protected against most solar storms. But there is no special risk associated with 2012. The next solar maximum will occur in the 2012-2014 time frame and is predicted to be an average solar cycle, no different than previous cycles throughout history.

I think that quote stands for itself. Plus, now they are saying that it might happen in 2014, not 2013.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
JFDee NY Times: Article about Solar Radiation Management Contrails and Chemtrails 2
Priyadi Islamic Rituals and Spherical Earth Flat Earth 0
Priyadi Eclipses and the Saros Cycle Flat Earth 3
Whitebeard Debunked: Nibiru FOUND? Mysterious gigantic rogue planet spotted lurking outside our solar system Science and Pseudoscience 1
skephu Solar geoengineering and the chemtrails conspiracy on social media Contrails and Chemtrails 3
Z.W. Wolf Claim: The Moon's Shadow During The Solar Eclipse Disproves Sphere Earth Flat Earth 97
Mick West Ground Truth: Verifying Stellarium's Model of The Solar System Flat Earth 2
Leifer "solar sun simulator", 1960's patent Flat Earth 4
skephu How much do contrails reduce the energy from solar cells? Contrails and Chemtrails 4
Svartbjørn The Solar System.. To Scale (just for fun, nothing to debunk here) General Discussion 0
G Needs debunking: Video of a solar eclipse is fake because we cannot see the moon covering the sun Flat Earth 5
Graham2001 Debunked: Sagan: Why is it that it is only our planet in the solar system that is like paradise? Quotes Debunked 12
Mick West Debunked: Chemtrail "Chembows" [Solar Halos] Contrails and Chemtrails 30
Mick West Solar Tube Shaped UFO over Korosten, Ukraine [CGI by Kaschuba brothers] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 28
Mick West Debunked: IPCC warns not to stop chemtrails, aka 'solar radiation management' Contrails and Chemtrails 11
electrojet Solar Still and Cloaking Technology General Discussion 3
J Solar Power for the home General Discussion 14
Mick West Debunked: V3Solar's spinning solar panel cone spin cell "CoolSpin" Science and Pseudoscience 172
U Are contrails affecting solar power generation in Australia? Contrails and Chemtrails 12

Related Articles

Top