Measuring the distance to the moon with laser reflections and the speed of light

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
Good work.. but like Mick stated before.. we first need to know the distance to the moon for these numbers to check out.. if you put the distance to be.. hmm lets say 3000 miles.. you get "slightly" different numbers..
Well we do know the distance to the moon. Unless you also want to throw out the most fundamental constant in the universe, ie the speed of light, then it's easy to measure. You fire a beam of light at the moon, and time how long it takes for the light to bounce back.


(Photo by M3long - Own work, GFDL, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3512980)

You find that it takes approximately two and a half seconds. A little less when the moon is at its closest, and a little more when the moon as at its furthest.

That's the time taken for a beam of light to travel there and back, so we multiply the time by the speed of light and divide by two:

upload_2016-11-23_11-16-46.png
 

Abishua

Member
Well we do know the distance to the moon. Unless you also want to throw out the most fundamental constant in the universe, ie the speed of light, then it's easy to measure. You fire a beam of light at the moon, and time how long it takes for the light to bounce back.


(Photo by M3long - Own work, GFDL, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3512980)

You find that it takes approximately two and a half seconds. A little less when the moon is at its closest, and a little more when the moon as at its furthest.

That's the time taken for a beam of light to travel there and back, so we multiply the time by the speed of light and divide by two:

View attachment 22913

speed of light is not a constant.. it depends on the medium.. and can be slowed even in vacuum if light shape is changed.. as shown here..

"Everyone knows that the speed of light in a vacuum is constant, but now it appears that there is a way to indirectly alter its speed—by running it through a special mask. Doing so apparently causes a change to the shape of the photon, making it move through a vacuum slower than an unaltered photon.

The researchers built what they called a racetrack—setting up a dual course for firing photons and detecting when they struck a detector a meter away. The first group of photons was fired in the normal way, while the second group was fired through a filter to shape it into either a Gaussian or Bessel beam. The photons from both groups were launched at the same time but the unshaped photons beat the shape-altered photons to the finish line by approximately 0.001 percent. There were two reasons for that. The first was that moving through the filter slowed the photons, much as would happen were they to pass through other mediums such as water or glass. The second reason was more complex, because it demonstrated that the speed of the photons was slower than normal after passing through the filter—light is supposed to speed back up to its normal constant after passing through a medium. The experiment showed that light can be caused to travel slower than c, by changing its shape.

The researchers explain this result by noting that they were using group velocity to measure the light's speed—a measurement of the group's envelope speed. The mask, they explain, caused some of the photons in the group to move at a slight angle to the other's causing a slowdown for the group as a whole. Thus, their results are not going to upend one of the basic tenets of modern physics, it is more likely that future researchers will have to make sure lab or astronomical observations are not being impacted by shape changes that occur naturally."



Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-01-physicists-air.html#jCp
 

Abishua

Member
That changed the speed by .001%, or one part in 100,000. So maybe 4km?
yeah.. the filter they used changed it that much.. but isn't there a "van alans belt" out there? 60 000km thick if I'm not remembering thing wrong? Shouldn't the light pass through it 2 times.. going to the moon and back? How does this radiation belt impact light, if it impacts it at all... They certenly did not use a filter 120 000km thick.. so unless we want to dable in guesswork I cannot use that as evidence.. since speed of light clearly is proven not to be the most fundamental constant in the universe as Trailblazer stated..
 

Spectrar Ghost

Senior Member.
yeah.. the filter they used changed it that much.. but isn't there a "van alans belt" out there? 60 000km thick if I'm not remembering thing wrong? Shouldn't the light pass through it 2 times.. going to the moon and back? How does this radiation belt impact light, if it impacts it at all... They certenly did not use a filter 120 000km thick.. so unless we want to dable in guesswork I cannot use that as evidence.. since speed of light clearly is proven not to be the most fundamental constant in the universe as Trailblazer stated..
The researchers explain this result by noting that they were using group velocity to measure the light's speed—a measurement of the group's envelope speed. The mask, they explain, caused some of the photons in the group to move at a slight angle to the other's causing a slowdown for the group as a whole. Thus, their results are not going to upend one of the basic tenets of modern physics, it is more likely that future researchers will have to make sure lab or astronomical observations are not being impacted by shape changes that occur naturally."
Did you read this part? You posted it. Or did you just look for the first result that seemed to confirm your beliefs?
 

Abishua

Member
Did you read this part? You posted it. Or did you just look for the first result that seemed to confirm your beliefs?
did you read this part?

"it is more likely that future researchers will have to make sure lab or astronomical observations are not being impacted by shape changes that occur naturally."
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
@Abishua , that experiment didn't alter the speed of light. That is just a simplistic explanation for laymen. What it altered was the group velocity, in other words the overall speed of a bunch of light waves.

And the experiment you describe was about making group velocities FASTER than c, which is totally irrelevant here. The speed of light does change depending on the refractive index of the medium it is travelling in. In air, it travels fractionally slower than it does in a vacuum. In glass, it travels about one third slower.

The lunar ranging experiments take into account the refractive index of the earth's atmosphere. It is equivalent to about an extra six metres of distance to the moon. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1968IAUS...32...86A


The Van Allen belts have an incredibly low density of particles compared to the Earth's atmosphere, trillions and trillions of times lower, so their effect on the speed of light will be immeasurably small. In fact the entire Van Allen belts weigh about 10 grams, or less than half an ounce. How do you imagine that much matter will refract the light?
 
Last edited:
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Clouds Givemethewillies Method of measuring the distance to horizon Flat Earth 1
Mick West Measuring Smart Meter RF Emissions 5G and Other EMF Health Concerns 1
Mick West Measuring 5G EMF and using ICNIRP Guidelines 5G and Other EMF Health Concerns 14
Rory Flat Earth debunked by measuring angles to the sun Flat Earth 36
StarGazer Measuring Horizon Drop And Earth's Equatorial Bulge From Rocket Launches Flat Earth 2
Mick West A DIY Theodolite for Measuring the Dip of the Horizon Flat Earth 148
Clouds Givemethewillies Measuring the Curvature of the Horizon with a Level Flat Earth 121
Davy Stone Proposed experiment measuring Doppler shift of the sun on a flat earth model Flat Earth 9
J Identifying the Mountains in JTolan's "Rocky Mountains" IR Video Flat Earth 31
Cassi O Google Maps Measure Distance Using Great Circle Flat Earth 0
Wiggles Claim: Distant Objects Being Obscured Is Due To the "Mirror Blocking" Effect of Inferior Mirages Flat Earth 7
R Utah "Flat Eath" Frozen Lake Experiment Shows Light Visible over Longer Distance than Expected Flat Earth 8
FlightMuj Explained: 443 km distance- mountains visible. Flat Earth 13
jeranism Explained: Observations of Canigou, Curvature of the Earth & Atmospheric Refraction Flat Earth 158
wonderland78 Help with a debate about curvature and distance calculations Flat Earth 30
Mick West Calculating the height of something in a P900 photo when distance is known Flat Earth 59
Mick West Contrail Angle with the Horizon - A Useful Distance Rule of Thumb? Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 8
Mick West Flat Earth Theory Debunked by Short Flights (QF27 & QF28) From Australia to South America Flat Earth 276
TEEJ How far away is that contrail? Streamwood, IL 2nd March 2015 Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 21
Mick West What's the Farthest Distance a Contrail is Visible at? Contrails and Chemtrails 98
Efftup How far away can I see an aircraft? Contrails and Chemtrails 26
J Strange lights on picture of the moon during "Blood Moon" [Stuck Pixels] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 10
I Moon moving "faster" than clouds Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 9
R Claim: Apollo 15-17 Live TV Feed - Antenna signal would be interrupted from all the violent shaking when Astronauts touch the buggy General Discussion 26
Getoffthisplanet [Fake] UFO's Casting Shadows On The Moon - "OVNI sur la Lune , 2020-03-26" Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 23
Nandude Light Fall Off in Apollo Missions - American Moon Documentary Conspiracy Theories 16
A Debunked: NASA tampered with the original television audio of the Apollo 11 moon landing Conspiracy Theories 1
A Debunked : Fake Set Moon Landing with TV Camera and Stairs Conspiracy Theories 3
Staffan Debunked: Wikileaks releases unused footage of moon landing (Capricorn One movie scenes) Conspiracy Theories 2
Mick West Recording ISS Transits of the Sun and Moon Flat Earth 4
mudr0 Claim: Australia was not visible from the moon for Apollo 11 Broadcasts Conspiracy Theories 7
Z.W. Wolf Claim: Moon Passing The Meridian Disproves Globe Earth Flat Earth 0
Rory Debunked: The Lunar Cycle affects birth rates Health and Quackery 26
Rory Debunked: Study shows link between menstrual cycle and the moon Health and Quackery 30
Astro Identifying Sun and Moon Transits Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
Mick West Multiple UFOs Fly Across Moon- Birds? Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 17
Mick West Explained: Mysterious Red Planet Like Object Filmed Next To The Moon. Atglen [Reflection] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0
Leifer "Mars will be as big as the Moon" no, it won't. Science and Pseudoscience 11
F WHAT IS THIS LINE? (on my Super Blue Blood Moon Photo) - Smarter Every Day 188 Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 11
Mick West Plane Flies in Front of Super Blue Blood Moon Eclipse Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 1
Rory Dublin Moon and sun in same sky disproves Spherical Earth Flat Earth 16
txt29 Apollo 17: alleged inconsistency of shadows Conspiracy Theories 34
Jared Some proof The Moon is not it's Own Light Source Flat Earth 2
nickrulercreator [Debunked] Apollo 14 Flag Waving Before Ascent? Science and Pseudoscience 21
HoaxEye 6 Giant Towers discovered on the Moon [Digital Artifacts/Glitches] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 33
Mick West Explained: Moon Terminator/Shadow UFOs UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 1
Abishua The Moon Tilt & Terminator Illusions Flat Earth 54
drhex Explained: Apollo 17 Photo of Earth from Moon Seems too High Conspiracy Theories 16
C Interesting observation of moon light phenomena i can't find the answer to ???? General Discussion 4
Whitebeard Contrail on Moon Disc? Contrails and Chemtrails 12
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top