DOW-UAP-PR109, fliying disc ?

[Nourali]

A very interesting one in my opinion.

https://www.war.gov/UFO/?type=.vid&...esolved-UAP-Report-Eastern-United-States-2015

The United States Navy Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) transferred this media to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) in 2022. The video contains 21 seconds of footage likely captured by an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2015.

Video Description: No formal data handling practices for UAP-related records existed at the time this media was reported to the UAPTF. This media was digitally altered before being reported to the UAPTF, and is presented as it was received by AARO.

00:01-00:08: No content.

00:09-00:11: An area of contrast becomes visible near the center of the screen, The area of contrast transits the sensor field-of-view, moving from right to left before exiting from upper left corner of the frame.

00:12-00:21: The footage repeats at a slower playback speed.

https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1014...ern-united-states-2015?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Despite the low resolution, the object becomes progressively more defined as it approaches. At its closest, it appears to have a distinctly tilted, lenticular shape that, to me, is difficult to reconcile with a bird, drone, aircraft, or balloon (or windblown debris).

 

[Mick West]

Despite the low resolution, the object becomes progressively more defined as it approaches. At its closest, it appears to have a distinctly tilted, lenticular shape that, to me, is difficult to reconcile with a bird, drone, aircraft, or balloon (or windblown debris).

The elongation/tilting of the shape appears to be from motion blur

(The irregular spacing here is from frame-rate mismatch in intermediate re-encoding)

It's really too low-resolution to tell much about the shape, and certainly not enough detail to rule out either balloons or aliens.

 

[JMartJr]

At its closest, it appears to have a distinctly tilted, lenticular shape that, to me, is difficult to reconcile with a bird, drone, aircraft, or balloon (or windblown debris).

Given the resolution, and (as I see now Mick has already pointed out) the likely motion blur, it looks to me to be consistent with any of those, though not sufficiently well resolved to tell if it in fact IS any of those.