There is a lot of speculation and generalizations so far on this thread.
My beef with this thread is that it has a feel of lazy debunking, even if I dont necessarily disagree with the ultimate result. Emails are released. A claim is made that the contents of the emails suggest that Sandy Hook was vacated months before Massacre event. I think the key word here is suggest. So, the quickest way to debunk this is to analyze the contents of the email, and show how the contents are being misinterpreted or just analyzed wrong. But Deirdre didnt attempt to do that. She instead, pointed to the supposed subject line, and said, thats it. end of story. She is entirely correct that these emails are labeled initially with something that looks like a subject line as "Changing Rooms". So, that should solve any misinterpretations. In my opinion, it does not. It actually creates more questions. This is even evident in her response, because she proceeded to throw mud at the wall and hope something would stick to explain why teachers would be moving, all which were total speculation even though they were included with quotes from a newspaper which makes the speculation look more official, but doesnt provide any evidence to support these speculations. I get it, teachers move rooms. But .. what does "teachers" mean? All teachers? Some teachers? Only teacher effected? Two or Four?
The problem with the email is that we are spying upon communications that two people were having on a subject they preliminarily knew and therefore cannot anticipate the meaning of words that would be understood between two people having a communication which they would use loosely without specifying in a precise manner.
I get the feeling like this is a widespread thing, whatever it is. I totally could be wrong ... but I could also go down the rabbit hole of speculation like Deirdre did and ask the same questions, in an opposite manner ... "Why would so many teachers have to move within the same building?" i dont know and I dont even know if thats the right question. All i know is that without the pdf, I think these answers are elusive, and hence, even with the subject header, considering the contents of the emails that seem to point to something way more drastic (IMO), I believe this should not be considered totally debunked yet.
Also, I am wondering if Deirdre has any evidence that the pdf WAS released and was recieved by Mt. Halbig, and Mr.Halbig did not release it. If not, there is an equal possibility that the pdf attached to the emails just werent released TO Halbig with the emails to begin with.
Im more concerned with strong debunking on this issue by the way. I really dont have a dog in the fight. Personally, I do find the emails to be pretty melodramatic if they were moving rooms. Doesnt mean they werent moving rooms. I highly doubt that most people would read the contents of the emails in a blind experiment and automatically assume they were referring to just moving rooms, but thats my opinion.
