txt29
Senior Member.
After the attack by a truck in Nice, as expected, a lot of conspiracy theories appeared on the web. Most of them are really very easy to debunk, with just simple logic, the knowledge of facts, or by googling a few photos or videos. Since I am currently in the Southern France, I have a lot of friends who questioned me about the attack, and presented me some of the conspiracy theories. I could easily enlighten them, and provide evidence excluding most of the CT claims, and the friends accepted it. There is, though, still one claim that I struggle to find solid explanation for: why there are no traces of blood or tissue on the truck? There are plenty of CT websites using it as a proof the scene was staged. The following video summarizes the CT briefly:
[mod removed video: no click policy, no good shots of the truck in video and because its disgusting to show deceased bodies for no reason or give this video publicity]
Of course, I know the claim about a staged attack is nonsense - there are countless photos, videos, and witnesses proving the reality of the attack, but I still fail to find a good argument to explain why there is no blood visible on the photos or videos of the truck. I've read the firemen had to remove body parts from below the truck, but I do not think they would wash the truck immediately after the attack, before any forensic procedures. Blood might have been on the front panel covering the engine, but I understood it fell down already at the beginning when the assassin forced the metallic barriers (unconfirmed). If the cover really fell at the beginning, the more surprising it would be not seeing any blood on the open engine with a lot of sharp elements.
The speed of the truck and its height might have play a role, but I understand that the lack of any traces of blood triggers conspiracy theories. So if anyone of you have some experience in this field, or can find any evidence or explanations, please post it here.
[mod removed video: no click policy, no good shots of the truck in video and because its disgusting to show deceased bodies for no reason or give this video publicity]
Of course, I know the claim about a staged attack is nonsense - there are countless photos, videos, and witnesses proving the reality of the attack, but I still fail to find a good argument to explain why there is no blood visible on the photos or videos of the truck. I've read the firemen had to remove body parts from below the truck, but I do not think they would wash the truck immediately after the attack, before any forensic procedures. Blood might have been on the front panel covering the engine, but I understood it fell down already at the beginning when the assassin forced the metallic barriers (unconfirmed). If the cover really fell at the beginning, the more surprising it would be not seeing any blood on the open engine with a lot of sharp elements.
The speed of the truck and its height might have play a role, but I understand that the lack of any traces of blood triggers conspiracy theories. So if anyone of you have some experience in this field, or can find any evidence or explanations, please post it here.
Last edited by a moderator: