Belfrey
Senior Member.
Indeed, and then do a Google search to learn what is meant by censored data in statistical analysis.Google: Climategate or "Censored Data" Folder
Indeed, and then do a Google search to learn what is meant by censored data in statistical analysis.Google: Climategate or "Censored Data" Folder
Do a Miriam Webster search to learn what censored and data mean in any context (particularly a supposed objective scientific one)...Yes, I understand your point, but it doesn't apply here...the IPCC "climate experts" were not discluding 'noise', they were violating the basic principals of science in order to assist a politically expedient result. (Do you even which data they removed, and what it did to the outcome of their model?...with the help of amplifying other data BTW.)Indeed, and then do a Google search to learn what is meant by censored data in statistical analysis.
Why would you take a technical term and deliberately apply it in the common usage, that seems dishonest.Do a Miriam Webster search to learn what censored and data mean in any context (particularly a supposed objective scientific one)...Yes, I understand your point, but it doesn't apply here...