9/11: PNAC Motive and Opportunity as evidence of an inside job

Status
Not open for further replies.
Assange is just a dude who published information he was given. That American authorities and media now call for his blood is somewhat laughable, especially the news agencies that take this position. Such choice irony, demonizing a man for providing unbiased information to the public as they completely fail in their supposed duty to provide unbiased information to the public.
I don't think Assange is any kind of hero, though. The real hero is Bradley Manning, who's been treated like a terrorist/enemy combatant instead of an American citizen for the "crime" of whistle-blowing on a horrendous act. He did the right thing, and sits in a cell for it, as his name is dragged through the mud of public opinion.

In my book Manning is an anarchist. If he operated in any other venue you might be right but the military can't tolerate anarchy.
 
This thread was predated by many years, (since 2003), by the Guardian, who pretty well summed up the situation even then.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2003/sep/06/september11.iraq

The conventional explanation is that after the Twin Towers were hit, retaliation against al-Qaida bases in Afghanistan was a natural first step in launching a global war against terrorism. Then, because Saddam Hussein was alleged by the US and UK governments to retain weapons of mass destruction, the war could be extended to Iraq as well. However this theory does not fit all the facts. The truth may be a great deal murkier. We now know that a blueprint for the creation of a global Pax Americana was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now vice-president), Donald Rumsfeld (defence secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy), Jeb Bush (George Bush's younger brother) and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of staff). The document, entitled Rebuilding America's Defences, was written in September 2000 by the neoconservative think tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC).
The plan shows Bush's cabinet intended to take military control of the Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power. It says "while the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein." The PNAC blueprint supports an earlier document attributed to Wolfowitz and Libby which said the US must "discourage advanced industrial nations from challenging our leadership or even aspiring to a larger regional or global role".

Content from External Source
It also points out:

The document also calls for the creation of "US space forces" to dominate space, and the total control of cyberspace to prevent "enemies" using the internet against the US. It also hints that the US may consider developing biological weapons "that can target specific genotypes [and] may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool".
Content from External Source
Hypocrisy at it's best.... 'We can have and threaten and maybe use whatever we like'... but others are guilty of war crimes.

I have no problem with people being prosecuted for war crimes.... just let it be accepted criteria across the board with no exceptions.
 
Amazing little known revelation about Bush's Crusade against Iraq to bring about the second coming via the forces of Gog and Magog. (The protectors of The City of London)

Ties in well with Blairs religious revelations on the issue.

http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php?section=library&page=haught_29_5

Incredibly, President George W. Bush told French President Jacques Chirac in early 2003 that Iraq must be invaded to thwart Gog and Magog, the Bible’s satanic agents of the Apocalypse.

Honest. This isn’t a joke. The president of the United States, in a top-secret phone call to a major European ally, asked for French troops to join American soldiers in attacking Iraq as a mission from God.
Now out of office, Chirac recounts that the American leader appealed to their “common faith” (Christianity) and told him: “Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East…. The biblical prophecies are being fulfilled…. This confrontation is willed by God, who wants to use this conflict to erase his people’s enemies before a New Age begins.”
This bizarre episode occurred while the White House was assembling its “coalition of the willing” to unleash the Iraq invasion. Chirac says he was boggled by Bush’s call and “wondered how someone could be so superficial and fanatical in their beliefs.”

Content from External Source


http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012...rile-them-up-to-justify-war-against-iran.html

According to French President Chirac, Bush told him that the Iraq war was needed to bring on the apocalypse:
In Genesis and Ezekiel Gog and Magog are forces of the Apocalypse who are prophesied to come out of the north and destroy Israel unless stopped. The Book of Revelation took up the Old Testament prophesy:
“And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.”
Bush believed the time had now come for that battle, telling Chirac:
“This confrontation is willed by God, who wants to use this conflict to erase his people’s enemies before a New Age begins”…
There can be little doubt now that President Bush’s reason for launching the war in Iraq was, for him, fundamentally religious. He was driven by his belief that the attack on Saddam’s Iraq was the fulfilment of a Biblical prophesy in which he had been chosen to serve as the instrument of the Lord.
And British Prime Minister Tony Blair long-time mentor, advisor and confidante said:
“Tony’s Christian faith is part of him, down to his cotton socks. He believed strongly at the time, that intervention in Kosovo, Sierra Leone – Iraq too – was all part of the Christian battle; good should triumph over evil, making lives better.”
Mr Burton, who was often described as Mr Blair’s mentor, says that his religion gave him a “total belief in what’s right and what’s wrong”, leading him to see the so-called War on Terror as “a moral cause”…
Anti-war campaigners criticised remarks Mr Blair made in 2006, suggesting that the decision to go to war in Iraq would ultimately be judged by God.

Content from External Source
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...q-War-major-new-questions-for-Tony-Blair.html

Mr Blair is accused of being “evangelical” in his approach to the world and hence to toppling Saddam Hussein’s regime, of making mistakes which led to British forces being ill-prepared for the invasion and caught out by the violent aftermath, and of being so determined to support President George W Bush that he imposed no preconditions for Britain going to war alongside the United States.
Content from External Source
 
Amazing little known revelation about Bush's Crusade against Iraq to bring about the second coming via the forces of Gog and Magog. (The protectors of The City of London)
...

But it says he was trying to *thwart* Gog and Magog. Surely it is part of God's Plan (TM) that they get to do their thing. The 'thousand years' hadn't expired or even begun.
He was clearly trying to thwart God's Will (TM). BAD christian zealot.
 
But it says he was trying to *thwart* Gog and Magog. Surely it is part of God's Plan (TM) that they get to do their thing. The 'thousand years' hadn't expired or even begun.
He was clearly trying to thwart God's Will (TM). BAD christian zealot.

Yep confusing I know but don't forget... we are talking GWya here... I expect he got a bit confused and had his book upside down.:) It is a big deal with well connected, very powerful people and massive funding and certainly not to be taken lightly.

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/10052007/transcript2.html


BILL MOYERS: How many people belong to Christians United for Israel? Well, they say they have the support of 50,000 pastors and their congregations. And that would be no mean number. Let's talk further now with two men who follow closely relations between American Christians and Israel.....

Dr. Timothy Weber is himself an evangelical Christian. Once a Baptist now a Presbyterian, a teacher and historian of religion, he taught at Denver Seminary and Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, among other schools. He's known as an innovator in graduate theological education and the author of LIVING IN THE SHADOW OF THE SECOND COMING and this one, On the ROAD TO ARMAGEDDON: HOW EVANGELICALS BECAME ISRAEL'S BEST FRIEND. Welcome to you both.

These people seem to be on a roll. They look as if they believe the future belongs to them. Right?
DR. TIMOTHY WEBER: This is one group in a long line of similar groups that-- began to organize in the late '70s and early '80s which combined a firm belief of Bible prophecy and a particular political agenda that has gained more and more power as the years have gone on.
BILL MOYERS: How do you account for the fact, rabbi, that there were more political actors among them than there were preachers?
RABBI MICHAEL LERNER: I think that that movement has three different parts to it. And one part is those people whose primary agenda is conservative politics in America and are using the issue of Israel as another part of their support for conservative politics. And if the United States moved away from Israel, they might move away from it. The second part are people who are dispensationalists, who believe that getting Israel into a huge battle with the Arab states is going to be good for bringing Jesus back onto our planet. And-
BILL MOYERS: Dispensationalist is a theological concept.
RABBI MICHAEL LERNER: Right. It's a theological concept. Then there are an awful lot of people who genuinely care about Jews; decent good people in this movement who, unfortunately, are being manipulated for a political agenda that is very, very different and, in my view, not at all in the best interests of the Jewish people or in the best interest of Israel.

Content from External Source
Tony Blair prayed to God during times of trouble and anxiety, the Alastair Campbell diaries reveal.
The former prime minister's communications chief says that before the Iraq invasion Mr Blair was guided by his faith and regularly spoke to "his maker".
The disclosure is ironic because No10 image-maker Mr Campbell tried to keep his boss's faith out of the media spotlight, telling one interviewer: "We don't do God."
Content from External Source

See also https://www.metabunk.org/posts/21136
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top