HappyMonday
Moderator
In the forums opinion, what are the most regular claims in relation to 9/11 which:
* Have been very persuasively debunked.
* You think are particularly powerful at making non-believers question themselves on the matter, or for reinforcing the beliefs of those who are interested but not evangelical about the subject.
To use the chemtrails theory as an example, I wonder what you all think are the 'some disappear, some persist' pieces of evidence in this case. It's a claim that's easily debunked, but is STILL in circulation amongst those believers who don't have the capacity to take the science on board, and I think is the thing that triggers CT-biased research into the matter most regularly in the first instance.
* Have been very persuasively debunked.
* You think are particularly powerful at making non-believers question themselves on the matter, or for reinforcing the beliefs of those who are interested but not evangelical about the subject.
To use the chemtrails theory as an example, I wonder what you all think are the 'some disappear, some persist' pieces of evidence in this case. It's a claim that's easily debunked, but is STILL in circulation amongst those believers who don't have the capacity to take the science on board, and I think is the thing that triggers CT-biased research into the matter most regularly in the first instance.