1. I'm confused about Gradisher's definition of UAP.

    While he does specifically say "The Navy designates the objects contained in these videos as unidentified aerial phenomena".

    Is it fair to say, "authorized, unidentified aircraft were observed operating in the airspace of various military-controlled training ranges"?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 12, 2019 at 11:36 AM
  2. deirdre

    deirdre Moderator Staff Member

    how can they be unidentified if they were authorized?
     
  3. Does permission absolutely require identification?

    I'm probably just over thinking it.

    But it is a weird way to frame all of this; unauthorized/unidentified, aircraft/objects, entering/operating and sightings/observations.
     
  4. deirdre

    deirdre Moderator Staff Member

    yes :) it's the military, not a ouija board session.

    i agree it's weird to write "unauthorized" unless to the military UAP can also mean "unauthorized aircraft phenomenon". ?? But that sounds doubtful to me that they would use the same term.
     
  5. lol

    Not to nitpick on Mr. Gradisher, well, actually to nitpick, if something is an aircraft hasn't it been somewhat identified?

    So...the Flir1, Go Fast and Gimbal videos show "unauthorized and unidentified aircraft and objects that are observed and sighted entering and operating in the airspace of various military-controlled training ranges".

    Yeesh.

    See, it's the /'s that throw me.

    If the things are unauthorized and unidentified, then how are they aircraft and objects?

    Is he saying one video shows an unauthorized and unidentified aircraft and another shows an unauthorized and unidentified object?

    But if something is an aircraft, then it's been identified. And if something is an object then it has not been identified.
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2019
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. jarlrmai

    jarlrmai Member

    It's a context issue, to the US military an aircraft is probably "unidentified" because they don't know make/model/flight number etc the only people that make the leap from unidentified in this context to alien spacecraft or and object not of human origin are people looking for aliens.
     
  7. Joe_the_Joe

    Joe_the_Joe New Member

    Authorized and unidentified would perhaps be the designation of an aircraft for training purposes pertaining to unidentified aircraft, and unauthorized and unidentified would be an actual incident? (Assuming a one-layer-deep rabbithole of authorization i.e. not a surprise drill)
    Authorized could potentially just mean that the aircraft got permission to enter the airspace first.
     
  8. Keith Beachy

    Keith Beachy Active Member

    If they are a secret program hypersonic vehicles which have been lost to the sea in Warning Areas along the coast where USAF/Navy/Marine pilots go to play. The Copilot on my crew lost his door panel on the T-38 he was flying at 700 mph in the Warning Area in along the coast in Northern California.

    The military/NASA/et al do not always deconflict (or schedule properly) with all agencies authorized, or who think the are authorized to use Military Airspace. Thus a Navy pilot could see a vehicle in the airspace they are playing in, and not have a clue what it is.

    My experience with scheduling errors, or thinking they can just use the Military Airspace and stuff that should not happen concern an SR-71 refueling next to Okinawa in a Warning Area. We are in orbit waiting for the SR-71 to takeoff, and I see a F-86 towing a triangular target right in front of us (I kind of sloughed into my seat... ). We are at 27-28,000 feet. We are kind of radio silent, and I look down in a minute or two and see what look like bees (other fighters below us) trying to attack the target the F-86 is towing. Then on Guard (emergency frequency for the Military 243.0, twice the freq of civil emergency), we hear knock it off, 'knock it off', and reference to the Tanker in the area...

    Thus it is possible for planes to be where other planes don't expert other planes or experiments to be. The military has a constant turnover, and "new guys" are always taking over positions. I know people don't properly schedule military airspace all the time. I have more war stories as examples.
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2019 at 8:35 PM
  9. That's what I meant by "authorized, unidentified aircraft were observed operating in the airspace of various military-controlled training ranges", but fell short in elucidating properly.

    Awesome story. Thanks for sharing it.

    But, as Greenewald stated yesterday:

    "training exercises utilizing classified drone or related technology seems like a plausible explanation for these encounters, ...these new statements by the Navy labeling the cases as “unidentified aerial phenomena” are making some second guess that theory."
     
  10. I completely agree with you.

    But, now I'm wondering, does the Navy labeling something unidentified exclude it being from classified? Would they use "unidentified" to obscure "classified"?

    And would NASA or DARPA or whoever have circled back and given a courtesy call up to the Navy saying, "Whoops. Yeah, those were ours. We're not gonna tell you what they are, but they're ours".

    Or would they leave the Navy hanging out to dry?