qed
Senior Member
I have encountered this question asked a few times by debunkers in threads, and it is an important question.
The primary objection to the NIST report is that the data for the computer simulation is not provided. If this information where provided, legitimate questions could be asked, such as, how sensitive is collapse vs non-collapse to changes to the input parameters.
Such a model would be of the utmost importance. I would love to experiment with the model, and we can use crowd-sourcing to run thousands of simulations.
The primary objection to the NIST report is that the data for the computer simulation is not provided. If this information where provided, legitimate questions could be asked, such as, how sensitive is collapse vs non-collapse to changes to the input parameters.
- So why have AE911, with all their Architects and Engineers, not built an open model based on the available plans?
Such a model would be of the utmost importance. I would love to experiment with the model, and we can use crowd-sourcing to run thousands of simulations.
- Surely a "conspiracy theorist" would argue that not providing such a model is evidence of a conspiracy on the part of AE911?