... There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that those 4 airliners were hijacked and flown into the buildings..
There is literally tons of evidence four airliners were stolen and used as kinetic energy weapons by faking four hijackings.
RADAR data tracking all four planes from take off to impact. This is easy to find from NTSB sources so I will not waste time giving URLs, it is easy to find. Not only NTSB summaries, but many people have the raw Radar data and have decoded it so to speak, and plotted the data; Even 9/11 truth fantasy inside job people have plotted the data and made up silly claims of swapped planes,etc. Radar data proves it was Flight 11, 175, 93, and 77; these are the facts and they have never been refuted.
FDR for 77 and 93 found where 77 and 93 were crashed on purpose by terrorists - facts in evidence, never refuted.
DNA in NYC, Pentagon, PA are from terrorists who boarded the flights; relatives of the murderers have failed to come forward and claim their kin. Not sure how many terrorist DNA was found in NYC, it is a fact too, it can be researched; the DNA for all passengers except the small boy was recovered at the Pentagon, and PA. Facts, which are evidence 77 and 93 crashed; evidence not refuted.
There are only four planes missing on 9/11, and each of theses planes was seen before crashing where they crashed, and this seeing by witnesses matches the exact time as Radar proves all four flights hit.
Zero evidence was found in the past 14 years for military drones; Which military drones do you know can hold 10,000 gallons, that is 66,000 pounds of jet fuel to make the jet fuel fireballs? Which military drones can hit with 2000 pounds of TNT in kinetic energy? Where is the math to match the kinetic energy damage for the claim of a military drone? Where is the evidence four military drones are missing?
The cockpit door sensor was not hooked up... just a note on other stuff 9/11 truth has claim based on lack of knowledge.
What is the serial number stuff? What is the difference between release of information on a crime vs an NTSB investigation into a accident? Who is up to speed on the legal aspects of crime vs NTSB accidents. All the crashes on 9/11 were crimes, thus the NTSB products are not standard NTSB release rules for accidents, but evidence and products requested by the FBI for investigation into crime.
The FDR for 77 and 93 included 24 to 25 hours of flights which match exactly where the aircraft were - the FDR for 77 and 93 prove they were passengers jets, along with DNA. The point is, access to the raw FDR data is available, and was gains also by 9/11 truth groups who tired to twist the data and make up false claims. Data for many flights; how can anyone ignore the data? Refuting the DNA and FDR evidence is the stuff for the biggest Pulitzer since Watergate - and no one can refute the data, DNA, and aircraft parts.
How do 9/11 truth groups refute the DNA? Where is the inside job scenario explained which covers how many people are in on the military drone, fake Radar, fake DNA, fake witnesses, Fake video, fake aircraft parts, and fake passengers? How can anyone claim military drone and ignore the tons of evidence? Where is the detailed inside job story?
http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/
Some of the NTSB data - other sources have the raw data from Radar and FDR - FOIA requests years ago got the data, and no one has refuted it. Can anyone?
http://www.ntsb.gov/about/Documents/Flight_Path_Study_UA93.pdf
There is a speed study which matches the video of 11 and 175... I would post the location, but since the NTSB did it for the FBI, some have the FOIA for DCA01MA063, and even the source for your cockpit door never opened, pilots for truth have the study on their web site , "Radar Data Impact Speed Study, Feb 7, 2002", and the 9/11 truth groups use this data to imply false claims. Ironically, reports and data collected by 9/11 truth groups refute their claims.