Bruno D.
Senior Member.
Before describing the claim, I'd like to say that I have no idea why Truthers do not try to "convince the world" about conspiracies using much simpler methods, like undebunkable theories, like the one below.
Claim:
- A few people from the government (and CIA, and FBI and others) knew something big was about to happen, but they simply chose to not act so that they could have a big excuse for a War on Terror and Patriotic Act and others. "They" could even suggest targets or fund trainings or anything else. The main goal is to involve as little people as possible on the conspiracy. There are actually some information of UK and other countries Intelligence warning US about that.
- The "they let it happen" conspiracy would take only a dozen people, and if anything leaked, "they" could always argue that it was incompetence rather than conspiracy.
- The only point is that "they" never thought that the towers would actually come down. "They" planned planes to explode on air, planes to hit buildings and so on, but no one could ever imagine that planes hitting the WTC would actually make both of them collapse.
So, is this claim debunkable?
My opinion is that it's not, because no one has all the information to prove or disprove it. And all the gains for "them" would be the exact same ones as the "controlled demolition" and similar.
The CTs could orchestrate their theories, proofs, videos, opinions, everything for the "they let it happen" theory, no sides would be able to convince the other one (this already happens :[ ) , and we would be spared of nonsense debates over the internet.
Claim:
- A few people from the government (and CIA, and FBI and others) knew something big was about to happen, but they simply chose to not act so that they could have a big excuse for a War on Terror and Patriotic Act and others. "They" could even suggest targets or fund trainings or anything else. The main goal is to involve as little people as possible on the conspiracy. There are actually some information of UK and other countries Intelligence warning US about that.
- The "they let it happen" conspiracy would take only a dozen people, and if anything leaked, "they" could always argue that it was incompetence rather than conspiracy.
- The only point is that "they" never thought that the towers would actually come down. "They" planned planes to explode on air, planes to hit buildings and so on, but no one could ever imagine that planes hitting the WTC would actually make both of them collapse.
So, is this claim debunkable?
My opinion is that it's not, because no one has all the information to prove or disprove it. And all the gains for "them" would be the exact same ones as the "controlled demolition" and similar.
The CTs could orchestrate their theories, proofs, videos, opinions, everything for the "they let it happen" theory, no sides would be able to convince the other one (this already happens :[ ) , and we would be spared of nonsense debates over the internet.