Latest activity
What's new
Staff online
-
flarkeySenior Member.
-
Ann K replied to the thread Major UFO experiences are specific to the observer.That statement bothers me. If that belief affects us all, if that belief means that (for a real-life current example) our taxpayer money goes toward UFO studies instead of fighting wildfires, then that "entitlement" of one group of believers... -
Gaspa reacted to JMartJr's post in the thread Is there a “UAP phenomenon” worth studying? with
Funny.
I'd suggest for the official UFOlogy motto: "Confide mihi, sodalis!" Or, more "dog-latinish," "Confide mihi, fra!" -
Gaspa reacted to flarkey's post in the thread Is there a “UAP phenomenon” worth studying? with
Like.
I've been thinking about your analogy to the Emperor's new clothes fable, and initially I thought that it wasn't quite right because the witnesses aren't seeing nothing, they are actually seeing something (lights, satellite, planes etc). However... -
Gaspa reacted to FatPhil's post in the thread Is there a “UAP phenomenon” worth studying? with Like.
You were nearly there ... whistletease Which reminds me - more research necessary, now that I've got your permission.
-
Ann K reacted to Smythe Bacchus's post in the thread Is there a “UAP phenomenon” worth studying? with Like.
If any "whistle-blower" out there had one shred of direct evidence, it would have been sent to recipients all over the world, many times over by now, via various anonymous methods, if desired. For obvious reasons, leakers of corruption and other...
-
Ann K reacted to FatPhil's post in the thread Is there a “UAP phenomenon” worth studying? with Like.
You were nearly there ... whistletease Which reminds me - more research necessary, now that I've got your permission.
-
Gary C reacted to Todd Feinman's post in the thread Major UFO experiences are specific to the observer with
Disagree.
You don't practice good science here. Even AARO and Sean Kirkpatrick were looking through NUFORC reports looking for corroborative evidence. I've watched the pareidoliac fits around the Calvine photo and it reminds me of the nonsense around the... -
purpleivan reacted to Todd Feinman's post in the thread Major UFO experiences are specific to the observer with Disagree.
You don't practice good science here. Even AARO and Sean Kirkpatrick were looking through NUFORC reports looking for corroborative evidence. I've watched the pareidoliac fits around the Calvine photo and it reminds me of the nonsense around the... -
Mauro reacted to econ41's post in the thread How did NIST calculate that the dynamic amplification factor for a suddenly applied load was 2 (FAQ 18) with Like.
I won't offer detailed comments on your 12 steps at this stage. The "factor 2" arises from aspects of fundamental physics that are independent of any specific application to the WTC collapses. So your 12 steps represent an explanation of the... -
Mauro reacted to Oystein's post in the thread How did NIST calculate that the dynamic amplification factor for a suddenly applied load was 2 (FAQ 18) with Like.
I'll try a verbal explanation of the "factor 2", if y'all don't mind. Numbered list of steps, so you can refer to a number if you have questions: The thing that's getting loaded is a "floor below". It's carrying itself already, plus any design...
-
Todd Feinman replied to the thread Major UFO experiences are specific to the observer.You don't practice good science here. Even AARO and Sean Kirkpatrick were looking through NUFORC reports looking for corroborative evidence. I've watched the pareidoliac fits around the Calvine photo and it reminds me of the nonsense around the... -
FatPhil reacted to econ41's post in the thread How did NIST calculate that the dynamic amplification factor for a suddenly applied load was 2 (FAQ 18) with Like.
I won't offer detailed comments on your 12 steps at this stage. The "factor 2" arises from aspects of fundamental physics that are independent of any specific application to the WTC collapses. So your 12 steps represent an explanation of the... -
FatPhil reacted to Oystein's post in the thread How did NIST calculate that the dynamic amplification factor for a suddenly applied load was 2 (FAQ 18) with Like.
I'll try a verbal explanation of the "factor 2", if y'all don't mind. Numbered list of steps, so you can refer to a number if you have questions: The thing that's getting loaded is a "floor below". It's carrying itself already, plus any design...
-
Gary C replied to the thread DOW-UAP-PR090, 24 August 2020, Centcom, released 22 May 2026.One such base is in Djibouti,
-
-
flarkey replied to the thread Is there a “UAP phenomenon” worth studying?.yeah, I'd thought a similar analogy might have been to the stories of 'fools gold', but it lacked the crowd mentality of the Emperor's New Cloak fable. And of course I wouldn't want to imply that UAP witnesses were in anyway considered as fools.
