To me, it looks like the light is not "touching" the cross in the first picture, it is inside the angle formed by the cross so you have an unobstructed view, though the glare impinges a bit. In the second pic, the light is closer to the...
Camera settings change due to ambient light changes in the shot. If the camera perceives that the over light in the shot has dimmed the changes could cause some local sources of light to bleed over. As probably happened here.
Thank you so much for this. I’m still confused as to why it looks like it’s behind the cross and then, after some time, looks like it’s in front. Shouldn’t it just always look the same? Shouldn’t it always look like it’s in front?
The moon's brightness overwhelms the camera sensor so the dark part of the cross disappears. Here's a picture of a sunset to illustrate that.
Bear in mind that with night-time photography, the aperture has to be wide open or else the picture...
The moon's brightness overwhelms the camera sensor so the dark part of the cross disappears. Here's a picture of a sunset to illustrate that.
Bear in mind that with night-time photography, the aperture has to be wide open or else the picture...
When I say 3:35 to 3:58, I’m talking about the video time. It’s 23 seconds. Even if it was minutes, how does it look like it’s in front of the cross?
Before:
After:
The moon is in a different location 28 mins later. Higher in the sky at 2:26 and closer to the horizon at 2:54 You can check this yourself using Stellarium. It is the moon. It is filmed (poorly) from the rooftops of the adjacent buildings.