So after reading your post I watched the video again.
The zoomed in UFO just looks like a drawing, on paper.
Also the moon clearly has some “light diffusion” effect around it, the UFO doesn’t.
Those “lights” on the pyramid just don’t look right.
But specifically how is it more trustworthy than these:
Source: https://twitter.com/glennbeck/status/2076753908253528511#m
[EDIT: rewite to equivalent twitter URL in order to persuade embedding to work]
The point is that if the ball touches anything other than the goal posts, then a "drop ball" is the rule. If the ball hit the cable, then technically the play should have stopped, and the ref should have given a drop ball.
I don't think that...
I'm suggesting that the the small reflections are due to a bright light inside the vehicle, which is also the source of the large bright light which appears to be outside the vehicle, but is in fact a reflection on the windows - first the left...
No one is entertaining a conspiracy theory. The discussion here has been about trying to understand the commentary around the ballistics and why there's not universal agreement about the outcome.
There's another possibility. Kirk was speaking to a large audience of his fans, and it's not impossible that in the confusion, one of them picked up a fragment of a bullet and pocketed it as a souvenir.
But were the people involved trying to demonstrate a viewpoint, or methodically testing a hypothesis? We know rifle rounds passing through substantial body masses can cause major exit wounds, and often do. That doesn't need demonstrating.
Those...
But specifically how is it more trustworthy than these:
Source: https://twitter.com/glennbeck/status/2076753908253528511#m
[EDIT: rewite to equivalent twitter URL in order to persuade embedding to work]
Many people online claim there were supernatural lights at Assuit, Egypt in 2000. Looking at the video I linked, it seems like there are lights on top of/near a church with no known source. Some have put this forth as evidence for Christianity...
To be fair, while some precocious toddlers begin to solve object permanence at just 4 months,
some of the slower ones don't completely master this until 12 months.
Good lord! Are there other Mitch clones out there!? :eek: One is enough. I did look for years for a Mitch bobblehead; even considered making one, but my mind then went to a bag on a spring, which could provide the benefits of exercise.