There's another possibility. Kirk was speaking to a large audience of his fans, and it's not impossible that in the confusion, one of them picked up a fragment of a bullet and pocketed it as a souvenir.
But were the people involved trying to demonstrate a viewpoint, or methodically testing a hypothesis? We know rifle rounds passing through substantial body masses can cause major exit wounds, and often do. That doesn't need demonstrating.
Those...
But specifically how is it more trustworthy than these:
Source: https://twitter.com/glennbeck/status/2076753908253528511#m
[EDIT: rewite to equivalent twitter URL in order to persuade embedding to work]
To be fair, while some precocious toddlers begin to solve object permanence at just 4 months,
some of the slower ones don't completely master this until 12 months.
Good lord! Are there other Mitch clones out there!? :eek: One is enough. I did look for years for a Mitch bobblehead; even considered making one, but my mind then went to a bag on a spring, which could provide the benefits of exercise.
Laura Loomer
Also, if he's in the hospital, why is there no IV connected to him to monitor his health?
This is such bullshit. His staff are liars.
**************************************************************
Okay, it's not exactly news...
The point is that if the ball touches anything other than the goal posts, then a "drop ball" is the rule. If the ball hit the cable, then technically the play should have stopped, and the ref should have given a drop ball.
I don't think that...
Sure, plain version: the "six-pointed star" isn't the shape of anything flying. It's made inside the camera itself.
When a camera looks at a really intense point of light (or heat, for an IR sensor), the light bends slightly around anything...
People are flexible. If Kirk had leaned forward, for example, that "0.03" might have been greater by some undefined amount.
The trajectory of a bullet is also not a straight line, but I don't know if that could be expected to make a difference...