Latest activity

  • FatPhil
    I'm looking at your image of the two sets of spikes. One has spikes pretty much bang on 12, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 o'clock, the other has them at closer to 12, 1:30, 4:30: 6, 7:30, and 10:30. The non-vertical ones clearly can be extended to meet each...
  • NorCal Dave
    NorCal Dave reacted to NoParty's post in the thread “Pyramid UFO” video from Brazil with Like Like.
    The craft is well known to interstellar travelers: It is the Koodac Atebitin, manufactured on Rigel VII from 1972-1993. And while the Handycam PJ5 only has "standard" (720 × 576) definition, it has two extraordinary features: First, a true 57x...
  • NorCal Dave
    I think it's possible that the ball ever-so-slightly grazed the cable...insufficient to register anything on the ball's "heartbeat," or enough to alter the trajectory at all or affect the gameplay. If players reacted strongly at that moment, as...
  • Mendel
    Mendel reacted to ExclusionZon's post in the thread Department of War - UAP Release 4 with Winner Winner.
    Sure, plain version: the "six-pointed star" isn't the shape of anything flying. It's made inside the camera itself. When a camera looks at a really intense point of light (or heat, for an IR sensor), the light bends slightly around anything...
  • Fritzkquzerk
    Way too old of a ship to be used in 2009. You’re surely wrong!
  • Mick West
    Yeah, I'm leaning towards it NOT hitting the wire now. I'm playing around with trajectories, and it does not seem like the ball is high enough to hit the wire.
  • Ravi
    I am not convinced a defocussed point of light will look like what we see. Also not when taking diffraction in account. In fact, optical diffraction spikes will be larger and more prominent, when being in better focus.
  • Ravi
    Ravi reacted to ExclusionZon's post in the thread Department of War - UAP Release 4 with Like Like.
    Fair, they're not perfectly collinear, already flagged that in the numbers actually. Measured separations were 64.5/54.9/60.6°, not an even 60/60/60, so there's a real asymmetry of a few degrees between the pairs. Noted it as being right at the...
  • GM4AJK
    Indeed, after watching the Sky TV recording I have (that I can't seem to share), this is basically what happened. No one reacted to anything until the Norwegian goalkeeper spoke to the ref after he blew the half-time whistle. It's only after that...
  • NorCal Dave
    NorCal Dave reacted to Harabeck's post in the thread Charlie Kirk Shooting with Agree Agree.
    Because anyone saying the boring thing aren't going to get surfaced on search engines and social media via attention driven algorithms?
  • E
    Fair, they're not perfectly collinear, already flagged that in the numbers actually. Measured separations were 64.5/54.9/60.6°, not an even 60/60/60, so there's a real asymmetry of a few degrees between the pairs. Noted it as being right at the...
  • Fritzkquzerk
    Yeah, same underlying camera artifact, different sensor/platform. The star shape itself doesn't tell you what's making the heat, that part's the same regardless of what's actually burning down there. Not familiar with the Chandelier video...
  • Fritzkquzerk
    https://www.metabunk.org/threads/pr038-the-chandelier-ufo.13307/ There you go! Thanks again for the answers about flares!
  • NorCal Dave
    So after reading your post I watched the video again. The zoomed in UFO just looks like a drawing, on paper. Also the moon clearly has some “light diffusion” effect around it, the UFO doesn’t. Those “lights” on the pyramid just don’t look right.
  • E
    Yeah, same underlying camera artifact, different sensor/platform. The star shape itself doesn't tell you what's making the heat, that part's the same regardless of what's actually burning down there. Not familiar with the Chandelier video...
Back
Top