I'm looking at your image of the two sets of spikes.
One has spikes pretty much bang on 12, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 o'clock, the other has them at closer to 12, 1:30, 4:30: 6, 7:30, and 10:30. The non-vertical ones clearly can be extended to meet each...
The craft is well known to interstellar travelers: It is the Koodac Atebitin, manufactured on Rigel VII from 1972-1993.
And while the Handycam PJ5 only has "standard" (720 × 576) definition, it has two extraordinary features:
First, a true 57x...
I think it's possible that the ball ever-so-slightly grazed the cable...insufficient to register anything on the ball's "heartbeat,"
or enough to alter the trajectory at all or affect the gameplay.
If players reacted strongly at that moment, as...
Sure, plain version: the "six-pointed star" isn't the shape of anything flying. It's made inside the camera itself.
When a camera looks at a really intense point of light (or heat, for an IR sensor), the light bends slightly around anything...
Yeah, I'm leaning towards it NOT hitting the wire now. I'm playing around with trajectories, and it does not seem like the ball is high enough to hit the wire.
I am not convinced a defocussed point of light will look like what we see. Also not when taking diffraction in account. In fact, optical diffraction spikes will be larger and more prominent, when being in better focus.
Fair, they're not perfectly collinear, already flagged that in the numbers actually. Measured separations were 64.5/54.9/60.6°, not an even 60/60/60, so there's a real asymmetry of a few degrees between the pairs. Noted it as being right at the...
Indeed, after watching the Sky TV recording I have (that I can't seem to share), this is basically what happened. No one reacted to anything until the Norwegian goalkeeper spoke to the ref after he blew the half-time whistle. It's only after that...
Fair, they're not perfectly collinear, already flagged that in the numbers actually. Measured separations were 64.5/54.9/60.6°, not an even 60/60/60, so there's a real asymmetry of a few degrees between the pairs. Noted it as being right at the...
Yeah, same underlying camera artifact, different sensor/platform. The star shape itself doesn't tell you what's making the heat, that part's the same regardless of what's actually burning down there.
Not familiar with the Chandelier video...
So after reading your post I watched the video again.
The zoomed in UFO just looks like a drawing, on paper.
Also the moon clearly has some “light diffusion” effect around it, the UFO doesn’t.
Those “lights” on the pyramid just don’t look right.
Yeah, same underlying camera artifact, different sensor/platform. The star shape itself doesn't tell you what's making the heat, that part's the same regardless of what's actually burning down there.
Not familiar with the Chandelier video...