Latest activity

So after reading your post I watched the video again. The zoomed in UFO just looks like a drawing, on paper. Also the moon clearly has some “light diffusion” effect around it, the UFO doesn’t. Those “lights” on the pyramid just don’t look right.

I'm sorry, but if you think those pairs of lines are parallel, you need better glasses. If whatever tool you are using is telling you that those lines are better alinged than any alternative, then you need a better tool.

The actual UFO looks awfully static. It seems like a cut-out picture of a UFO just taped to a black background. The first 30 seconds or so are the establishing shots, showing that the bright light is the moon and the people are out in a yard or...

Yeah, thanks, I figured it was a camera artifact because it's basically identical to the Chandelier Video, but I got a bit totally lost in the specific technical jargon. So basically it's just the same as the previous "Chandelier star UFO" video...

The actual UFO looks awfully static. It seems like a cut-out picture of a UFO just taped to a black background. The first 30 seconds or so are the establishing shots, showing that the bright light is the moon and the people are out in a yard or...

Sure, plain version: the "six-pointed star" isn't the shape of anything flying. It's made inside the camera itself. When a camera looks at a really intense point of light (or heat, for an IR sensor), the light bends slightly around anything...

I don't know why we have to keep entertaining this silly conspiracy theory that this guy didn't shoot Kirk. There is no other REASONABLE conclusion. So what if the bullet didn't do what some "experts" claim it WOULD do (its own red flag, as if...

Because anyone saying the boring thing aren't going to get surfaced on search engines and social media via attention driven algorithms?

No one is entertaining a conspiracy theory. The discussion here has been about trying to understand the commentary around the ballistics and why there's not universal agreement about the outcome.

I don't know why we have to keep entertaining this silly conspiracy theory that this guy didn't shoot Kirk. There is no other REASONABLE conclusion. So what if the bullet didn't do what some "experts" claim it WOULD do (its own red flag, as if...

Sure, plain version: the "six-pointed star" isn't the shape of anything flying. It's made inside the camera itself. When a camera looks at a really intense point of light (or heat, for an IR sensor), the light bends slightly around anything...

No one is entertaining a conspiracy theory. The discussion here has been about trying to understand the commentary around the ballistics and why there's not universal agreement about the outcome.

There's an actual video of the Norwegian's bench after Bellingham scored. In it, you see the manager throw a water bottle in anger but the rest of his bench are firmly all rooted in their seats, no one is reacting to anything unusual at that...

I don't know why we have to keep entertaining this silly conspiracy theory that this guy didn't shoot Kirk. There is no other REASONABLE conclusion. So what if the bullet didn't do what some "experts" claim it WOULD do (its own red flag, as if...

Sure, plain version: the "six-pointed star" isn't the shape of anything flying. It's made inside the camera itself. When a camera looks at a really intense point of light (or heat, for an IR sensor), the light bends slightly around anything...