Latest activity

This is what happens when you have to rely on witness testimony of what's in the article!

It's very difficult to tell what the intrinsic motion of the object is and what the camera motion is - both angular movements (the operator recentering it) and motion parallax. Here I've full stabilized it on the object. But there's a lot of...

It's very difficult to tell what the intrinsic motion of the object is and what the camera motion is - both angular movements (the operator recentering it) and motion parallax. Here I've full stabilized it on the object. But there's a lot of...

Motion blur can of course also happen when the camera filming it, is moving fast with respect to the "area of high contrast". In my view this video is (as almost as per normal) just not giving enough information to make conclusive identification...

Agreed. We have French UFO researcher @Baptiste Fr making similar claims in the French UFO assembly thread. He repeatedly emphasized the importance of witness testimony. Yet once again, here is a prime example of supposedly accurate witness...

Its usually called a reticule... https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/reticule

Someone's clearly motion tracked the object and zoomed in Could have been done in After Effects and this is the resulting video, not filmed by a phone. The zoom pretty much removes the context of the movement, there's nothing to center on to...

Someone's clearly motion tracked the object and zoomed in Could have been done in After Effects and this is the resulting video, not filmed by a phone. The zoom pretty much removes the context of the movement, there's nothing to center on to...

Good thought, that had not occurred to me.

This is what happens when you have to rely on witness testimony of what's in the article!

"The featured image in this post was ..." in the singular. I also only see one image of the plane in flight on that page - isn't it wonderful that different people are being shipped different content.

Indeed. Like 99% of the released videos.

I haven't watched the video of Kirk being hit, but some accounts suggest he was hit on the left side of his neck, causing an immediate catastrophic haemorrhage. I don't know what direction Kirk was facing relative to the shooter. We do not know...

What always made me laugh about that show is that they'd knock on a tree, and hear a 'response' 10 seconds later....as if some bigfoot was standing there with a stick waiting to respond immediately. And when they even said they were in a 2 mile...

I’m not getting it. An “IR sensor” that makes a video is an IR camera. No?