Latest activity

With very little modification I could accept something like that sentence. It's true inasmuch as almost all people are unreliable observers almost all of the time. And because of that, you can strike the "something difficult to explain" part...

We live in a world where some people claim to have seen the Loch Ness Monster up close, while others claim to have seen Bigfoot walking among the trees. People report seeing fairies and gnomes, ghosts and the Mothman. Even more people claim to...

I did not state anything. Indeed you said (post #31): Now it'd be interesting to know what you actually think, do we have good photos (in which case, obviously, I'd like to know which they are!) or don't we? But yet again, what I wanted to...

I did not state anything. Indeed you said (post #31): Now it'd be interesting to know what you actually think, do we have good photos (in which case, obviously, I'd like to know which they are!) or don't we? But yet again, what I wanted to...

The members at Metabunk have looked at a very large number of cases, and failed to find any really convincing examples. If you have some good examples we will be pleased to examine them. Note, however, that most examples from the 20th century...

I feel that this thread doesn't contain enough traditional bunk, and that needs to change: Source: https://twitter.com/nafoviking/status/2068727261340037170

It's not a bold claim at all. Pais has filed several patents, but the one we've been discussing is US10144532B2, "Craft using an inertial mass reduction device", 28 April 2016, https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en, the one raised and...

More important in this respect in my country was the fall of the Wold Newton Meteorite, a large chondrite meteor that fell in 1795, very close to an observer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wold_Cottage_meteorite This does prove that sometimes...

The members at Metabunk have looked at a very large number of cases, and failed to find any really convincing examples. If you have some good examples we will be pleased to examine them. Note, however, that most examples from the 20th century...

Whatever shows up, I'm sure someone will point a laser at it. No possible downsides.

I would refer you to the discovery of meteors I explained ealier, in the case of the Aigle meteor shower.

I would refer you to the discovery of meteors I explained ealier, in the case of the Aigle meteor shower.

You can assert the reliability of the witness, and you know that the interpretation part of his testimony is subject to bias. By language analysis you can determine which part is the interpretation and focus on the most reliable part.

Science and the Law are different, we really have to consider that.

Most judicial systems heavily rely on witness testimony. There was a time material evidence almost didn't exist.