Latest activity

The members at Metabunk have looked at a very large number of cases, and failed to find any really convincing examples. If you have some good examples we will be pleased to examine them. Note, however, that most examples from the 20th century...

I feel that this thread doesn't contain enough traditional bunk, and that needs to change: Source: https://twitter.com/nafoviking/status/2068727261340037170

It's not a bold claim at all. Pais has filed several patents, but the one we've been discussing is US10144532B2, "Craft using an inertial mass reduction device", 28 April 2016, https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en, the one raised and...

More important in this respect in my country was the fall of the Wold Newton Meteorite, a large chondrite meteor that fell in 1795, very close to an observer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wold_Cottage_meteorite This does prove that sometimes...

The members at Metabunk have looked at a very large number of cases, and failed to find any really convincing examples. If you have some good examples we will be pleased to examine them. Note, however, that most examples from the 20th century...

Whatever shows up, I'm sure someone will point a laser at it. No possible downsides.

I would refer you to the discovery of meteors I explained ealier, in the case of the Aigle meteor shower.

I would refer you to the discovery of meteors I explained ealier, in the case of the Aigle meteor shower.

You can assert the reliability of the witness, and you know that the interpretation part of his testimony is subject to bias. By language analysis you can determine which part is the interpretation and focus on the most reliable part.

Science and the Law are different, we really have to consider that.

Most judicial systems heavily rely on witness testimony. There was a time material evidence almost didn't exist.

I said birds, not planes, planes move in a linear fashion at constant speed. For meteors, they are indentified by the mind and suffer no fear of peer pressure, so it's logical that we have more. The fact that you consider that we have absolutely...

I'm not in charge of that case, maybe you could ask one of the ground investigators? I think the Tedesco brothers were there.

So you've already have their answer, please publish it, i'd be interested to read it

We have good photos, the fact that you are stating that we have none makes me think you already categorized that none exists, and as I'm not here to convince you, I'll not enter a debate on cases with photographic proof, and I'll let you to your...