Latest activity

Sigma2's director Luc Dini seems to be closely linked to the usual suspects. He is one of the numerous co-authors of the "New Science of UAP" papers He organised a seminar with Mellon and Vallée...

Sigma2 is a subgroup of French aerospace interest group 3AF (Association Aéronautique et Astronautique de France, https://www.3af.fr/en/about-3af/mission-6531) that is interested in UFO reports. One of the articles on their website is "About...

Sigma2's director Luc Dini seems to be closely linked to the usual suspects. He is one of the numerous co-authors of the "New Science of UAP" papers He organised a seminar with Mellon and Vallée...

Just agree on "there's no evidence NHI exist". There's no evidence that Santa Claus exists, either.

I would bet, it's free money at this point. The precedent-setter is Philip J. Klass, again, 40 to 50 years ago: The $10,000 offer In 1966, Klass made an offer that stood for the remaining thirty-nine years of his life. By 1974, the offer had...

I found the MiB spying on the Grusch press conference.

That’s a good point! But then I think I’d be able to debunk them. If not, I’ll post them on Metabunk.

this is also the reason why it's entirely useless for science to study (to answer the title question)

Off topic. We are discussing whether there is actually something to study, not whether you want "them" to be studied. The question is, do "they" exist at all? Off topic. Off topic. Off topic. If you don't know, that would be a good time to...

Sigma2's director Luc Dini seems to be closely linked to the usual suspects. He is one of the numerous co-authors of the "New Science of UAP" papers He organised a seminar with Mellon and Vallée...

You wouldn't want to interact on a daily basis with the objects I've seen. Up close. Many people just wouldn't be able to deal with it. It is one thing to see a distant light source doing odd things, but another to see things closer. I'm...

I've always disagreed with that, for reasons stated above. Studying murders more thoroughly might be more fruitful! (your grammatical problem notwithstanding, you meant "not 100% of murders get solved") don't be so open-minded your brain falls...

So therefore they should be detectable - repeatedly, predicably and objectively. And therefore if they are not detected then we could postulate that absence of evidence is, in that case, evidence of absence , ie non-existence. (Probably).

UAP reports can be studied. But commissions have established 50 years ago that there is little scientific value in it.⁴ However much the believers claim otherwise, a UAP phenomenon has not been shown to exist¹. There is no set of characteristics...

The problem is, if you give me a two-year-old video of, say, a dot of light over the ocean that appears to show anomalous acceleration, what am I supposed to do with that as a researcher? I can't go back and set up sensors and there's no more...